Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;68(1):62-7.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls119. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project

Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas  1 , Catherine Féart, Giovanni Mann, Jose Viña, Somnath Chatterji, Wojtek Chodzko-Zajko, Magali Gonzalez-Colaço Harmand, Howard Bergman, Laure Carcaillon, Caroline Nicholson, Angelo Scuteri, Alan Sinclair, Martha Pelaez, Tischa Van der Cammen, François Beland, Jerome Bickenbach, Paul Delamarche, Luigi Ferrucci, Linda P Fried, Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo, Kenneth Rockwood, Fernando Rodríguez Artalejo, Gaetano Serviddio, Enrique Vega; FOD-CC group (Appendix 1)
Affiliations

Searching for an operational definition of frailty: a Delphi method based consensus statement: the frailty operative definition-consensus conference project

Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus regarding the definition of frailty for clinical uses.

Methods: A modified Delphi process was used to attempt to achieve consensus definition. Experts were selected from different fields and organized into five Focus Groups. A questionnaire was developed and sent to experts in the area of frailty. Responses and comments were analyzed using a pre-established strategy. Statements with an agreement more than or equal to 80% were accepted.

Results: Overall, 44% of the statements regarding the concept of frailty and 18% of the statements regarding diagnostic criteria were accepted. There was consensus on the value of screening for frailty and about the identification of six domains of frailty for inclusion in a clinical definition, but no agreement was reached concerning a specific set of clinical/laboratory biomarkers useful for diagnosis.

Conclusions: There is agreement on the usefulness of defining frailty in clinical settings as well as on its main dimensions. However, additional research is needed before an operative definition of frailty can be established.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the Delphi process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Methods and cutoff points to classify the statements according to the reached agreement.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Rate of answer and status of the statements in the different stages of our Delphi process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Seeman TE, Merkin SS, Crimmins EM, Karlamangla AS. Disability trends among older Americans: National Health And Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:100–107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H, Morley JE, Kritchevsky SB, Vellas B. The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12:29–37. - PubMed
    1. Rockwood K, Hogan DB, MacKnight C. Conceptualisation and measurement of frailty in elderly people. Drugs Aging. 2000;17:295–302. - PubMed
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156. - PubMed
    1. de Vries NM, Staal JB, van Ravensberg CD, Hobbelen JS, Olde Rikkert MG, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;10:104–114. - PubMed

Publication types