Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;117(2):225-36.
doi: 10.3109/03009734.2012.658974.

Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with rectal cancer: Development during the past decades and plans for the future

Affiliations

Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with rectal cancer: Development during the past decades and plans for the future

Bengt Glimelius. Ups J Med Sci. 2012 May.

Abstract

In rectal cancer treatment, both the local primary and the regional and systemic tumour cell deposits must be taken care of in order to improve survival. The three main treatments, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, each with their own advantages and limitations, must then be combined to improve results. Several large randomized trials have shown that combinations of the modalities have markedly reduced the loco-regional recurrences, but have not yet had any major influence on overall survival. The best integration of the weakest modality, to date the drugs (conventional cytotoxics and biologicals), is not known. A new generation of trials exploring the best sequence of treatments is required. Furthermore, treatment of rectal cancer is administered to populations of individuals, based upon clinical factors and imaging, and can presently not be further individualized. There is an urgent need to develop response predictors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Subgrouping of localized rectal cancer assessed by MRI 1) and recommended primary treatment. 1)The algorithm does not primarily address the risk of systemic disease, although this risk also increases with the presence of many of ‘the risk factors’, however, not necessarily parallel to the local failure rate (LFR). The algorithm is also ‘too simplified’ in that also other factors like size of the mesorectum, anterior or posterior location, extramural vascular invasion (EMVI+) are relevant. The recommendations are the ones in use at most centres in Sweden in 2011. 2)Calculated in the group of patients planned for surgery, i.e. irrespective of the surgical outcome. The figures are valid if the surgeon is an experienced rectal cancer surgeon and no pretreatment is given. 3)A local procedure is possible in a few patients (chiefly pT1, sm1 (+2), N0). This group is in the text referred to as ‘very favourable’. 4)CRT means chemoradiotherapy to 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions with 5-fluorouracil (capecitabine); 5 × 5 Gy with delayed surgery is used in patients not fit for CRT.

References

    1. Birgisson H, Talback M, Gunnarsson U, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Improved survival in cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:845–53. - PubMed
    1. den Dulk M, Krijnen P, Marijnen CA, Rutten HJ, van de Poll-Franse LV, Putter H, et al. Improved overall survival for patients with rectal cancer since 1990: the effects of TME surgery and pre-operative radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:1710–16. - PubMed
    1. Lemmens V, van Steenbergen L, Janssen-Heijnen M, Martijn H, Rutten H, Coebergh JW. Trends in colorectal cancer in the south of the Netherlands 1975–2007: rectal cancer survival levels with colon cancer survival. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:784–96. - PubMed
    1. Klint A, Engholm G, Storm HH, Tryggvadottir L, Gislum M, Hakulinen T, et al. Trends in survival of patients diagnosed with cancer of the digestive organs in the Nordic countries 1964–2003 followed up to the end of 2006. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:578–607. - PubMed
    1. Stahle E, Enblad P, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Can mortality from rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma be predicted from histopathological variables in the diagnostic biopsy? APMIS. 1989;97:513–22. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources