Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Aug;9(8):1288-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.017. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity: prospective validation trial of a novel technique in survivors of acute myocardial infarction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity: prospective validation trial of a novel technique in survivors of acute myocardial infarction

Petra Barthel et al. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Low baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) indicates poor prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Noninvasive BRS assessment is complicated by nonstationarities and noise in electrocardiogram and pressure signals. Phase-rectified signal averaging is a novel signal processing technology overcoming these problems.

Objective: To prospectively validate a BRS measure (baroreflex sensitivity assessed by means of phase-rectified signal averaging [BRS(PRSA)]) based on this technology.

Methods: Nine hundred forty-one consecutive acute myocardial infarction survivors aged 80 years or younger in sinus rhythm were prospectively enrolled at 2 German university hospitals. All patients underwent 30-minute recordings of electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressures (Portapres; TNO-TPD Biomedical Instrumentation, Amsterdam, Netherlands) within the first 2 weeks after myocardial infarction. BRS(PRSA) was prospectively dichotomized at 1.58 ms/mm Hg. Primary end point was all-cause mortality at 5 years. Multivariable analyses included Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score (dichotomized at ≥120), sex, BRS(PRSA), left ventricular ejection fraction (dichotomized at ≤35%), and diabetes mellitus. BRS(PRSA) was compared with 3 standard noninvasive BRS measures, that is, the sequence method, the transfer function method, and the correlation method.

Results: During follow-up, 72 patients (7.7%) died. BRS(PRSA) stratified the study population into a high-risk group of 405 patients (≤1.58 ms/mm Hg) with an estimated 5-year mortality of 14.2% and a low-risk group of 536 patients (>1.58 ms/mm Hg) with a 5-year mortality of 2.8% (P <.0001). On multivariable analysis, BRS(PRSA) ≤ 1.58 ms/mm Hg was associated with a hazard ratio of 3.1 (confidence interval 1.7-5.6; P = .001). Predictive power of BRS(PRSA) ≤ 1.58 ms/mm Hg was particularly strong in patients with a Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score of ≥120 or with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%.

Conclusion: BRS(PRSA) is a powerful and independent predictor of mortality in postinfarction patients especially when assessed in patients with a Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events score of ≥120 or a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35%.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources