Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;98(1):F15-20.
doi: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-301572. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

Babies born at the threshold of viability: changes in survival and workload over 20 years

Sarah E Seaton  1 , Sophie King, Bradley N Manktelow, Elizabeth S Draper, David J Field
Affiliations
Free PMC article

Babies born at the threshold of viability: changes in survival and workload over 20 years

Sarah E Seaton et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Jan.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To assess the care given to the babies born at the threshold of viability over the last 20 years using regional and national data.

Design: Population-based retrospective study.

Setting: Former 'Trent' health region.

Participants: Babies born between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2010 at 22(+0) to 25(+6) weeks gestational age.

Main outcome measure: Survival and use of respiratory support.

Methods: Data of all babies born between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2010 with a gestational age of 22(+0) to 25(+6) weeks and admitted to a neonatal unit were extracted from The Neonatal Survey. Use of respiratory support in terms of ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for this group of babies was calculated as a proportion of the total used by the whole neonatal intensive care population within the defined study area.

Results: The proportion of babies surviving to discharge increased significantly over time in those born at 24 and 25 weeks (p<0.01) but failed to achieve statistical significance for those at 23 weeks (p=0.08). No babies born at 22 weeks survived. The babies born at 22-25 weeks accounted for 26.3% of all ventilation and 21.5% of CPAP given.

Conclusion: Our work concurs with the current UK guidelines. There could be advantages in focusing the care of babies born at 23 weeks to a small number of intensive care units to allow specialist expertise to develop in all aspects of the management of these babies. However, focusing care will not necessarily improve survival or reduce morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of each outcome by gestational age (22 to 25 weeks) for all babies alive at the onset of labour: former ‘Trent’ health region 1996 to 2000 and 2001 to 2005.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nuffield Council on Bioethics Critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine: ethical issues, 2006
    1. Wilkinson AR, Ahluwalia J, Cole A, et al. Management of babies born extremely preterm at less than 26 weeks of gestation: a framework for clinical practice at the time of birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F2–5 - PubMed
    1. Allen V, Levy A. ‘Doctors told me it was against the rules to save my premature baby’. Avaliable online at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1211950/Premature-baby-left-die-... Daily Mail. UK, 2009. (accessed 16 Feb 2012)
    1. Wishart A. Premature babies battle for survival at ‘edge of life’. Online at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12625253 BBC News, 2011. (accessed 24 October 2011)
    1. Dutch Pediatric Association Your extremely preterm baby, medical treatment and your role as a parent. Online at http://www.nvk.nl/Kwaliteit/Richtlijnenenindicatoren/Richtlijnen/Richtli... 2010. (accessed 24 October 2011)

Publication types