Analyses of health outcomes from the 5 sites participating in the Africa and Asia clinical efficacy trials of the oral pentavalent rotavirus vaccine
- PMID: 22520132
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.124
Analyses of health outcomes from the 5 sites participating in the Africa and Asia clinical efficacy trials of the oral pentavalent rotavirus vaccine
Abstract
Background: Efficacy of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (PRV), RotaTeq(®), against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) was evaluated in two double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase III clinical trials conducted in GAVI-eligible countries in Africa (Ghana, Kenya, and Mali) and in Asia (Bangladesh and Vietnam) from March 2007 through March 2009. The findings from each continent have been analyzed and presented separately, according to a single identical protocol. Ad hoc analyses combining data from the five sites were performed to further assess the impact of PRV.
Methods: 6674 infants (4705 infants from Africa and 1969 infants from Asia), randomized 1:1 to receive 3 doses of PRV/placebo at approximately 6-, 10-, and 14-weeks of age according to each country's EPI schedule, were included in the per protocol efficacy analysis. Breastfeeding and concomitant administration of EPI vaccines, including OPV, were allowed. Episodes of gastroenteritis (GE) in infants who presented to study facilities were captured and scored using the 20-point Vesikari scale. Stool samples were analyzed by rotavirus-specific EIA to detect presence of rotavirus antigen and RT-PCR to determine the G/P genotypes. We assessed efficacy to prevent all-cause GE and RVGE at a variety of cut-off points (score≥11, severe; score≥15, very severe).
Results: Vaccine efficacy (VE) against RVGE, regardless of serotype, through the entire follow-up period for any severity, severe (score≥11), and very severe (score≥15) was 33.9%, 95% CI (22.7, 43.5), 42.5%, 95% CI (27.4, 54.6), and 51.2%, 95% CI (26.3, 68.2), respectively. Through the first year of life, VE against severe RVGE was 58.9%, 95% CI (40.0, 72.3) and against all-cause severe GE was 23.0%, 95% CI (5.4, 37.3). VE against severe RVGE caused by non-vaccine G serotypes, G8 and G9, through the entire follow-up period was 87.5%, 95% CI (6.8, 99.7) and 48.0%, 95% CI (-5.5, 75.6), respectively. All G8 strains were associated with P2A[6] (a P-type not contained in PRV), while the majority of the G9 strains were associated with P1A[8] (a P-type contained in PRV).
Conclusions: Combining data from the 5 sites strengthens the precision of VE estimates and reveals rising VE with increased RVGE severity. Extrapolating data from VE against severe GE and RVGE suggest that 39% of severe GE episodes during the first year of life were due to rotavirus, highlighting substantial, potentially preventable, public health burden of RVGE. PRV provides protection against non-vaccine serotypes (G8P2A[6]).
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Secondary efficacy endpoints of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against gastroenteritis in sub-Saharan Africa.Vaccine. 2012 Apr 27;30 Suppl 1:A79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.01.022. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 22520141 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in a high HIV prevalence population in Kenya.Vaccine. 2012 Apr 27;30 Suppl 1:A52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.043. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 22520137 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of the oral pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in Mali.Vaccine. 2012 Apr 27;30 Suppl 1:A71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.094. Vaccine. 2012. PMID: 22520140 Clinical Trial.
-
Update on Rotarix: an oral human rotavirus vaccine.Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009 Dec;8(12):1627-41. doi: 10.1586/erv.09.136. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009. PMID: 19943758 Review.
-
Rotavirus live, oral, pentavalent vaccine.Clin Ther. 2007 Dec;29(12):2724-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.018. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 18201590 Review.
Cited by
-
Binding Patterns of Rotavirus Genotypes P[4], P[6], and P[8] in China with Histo-Blood Group Antigens.PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134584. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26274396 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of a monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2136-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62630-6. Epub 2014 Mar 12. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24629994 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improving rotavirus vaccine coverage: Can newer-generation and locally produced vaccines help?Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Feb 1;14(2):495-499. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1403705. Epub 2017 Dec 21. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018. PMID: 29135339 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The performance of licensed rotavirus vaccines and the development of a new generation of rotavirus vaccines: a review.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Mar 4;17(3):880-896. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1801071. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021. PMID: 32966134 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy and Effectiveness in Countries with High Child Mortality.Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;10(3):346. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030346. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35334978 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical