Outpatient percutaneous central venous access in cancer patients
- PMID: 2252135
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80773-1
Outpatient percutaneous central venous access in cancer patients
Abstract
A 1-year experience of percutaneous subclavian catheterization in outpatients with cancer was reviewed to document reliability, safety, and cost. There were 763 catheter insertions attempted with prospective documentation of complications in 664 consecutive patients. Catheter insertion was successful in 722 attempts (95%). There were only 13 pneumothoraces (2%). Thirty catheters required repositioning (4%). The average catheter duration was 191 days (range: 0 to 892 days). Fifty-six catheters (8%) were removed because of suspected infection. Documented catheter sepsis occurred in 21 patients (3%); catheter site infection occurred in 8 patients (1%). Thus, only 0.22 infections per catheter year occurred during this 382 catheter-year experience. The estimated cost of catheter insertion was $562, which is one-third the estimated cost for tunneled catheters ($1,403) and for reservoir devices ($1,738). In our experience, percutaneous subclavian catheterization is a reliable, cost-effective method compared with tunneled or reservoir devices, with an equivalent incidence of catheter-related infections. The cornerstone of our success with this program is a staff dedicated to catheter care and intensive patient education. In centers where a large number of patients require central venous access, percutaneous catheterization should be the technique of choice.
Similar articles
-
Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.Arch Intern Med. 1993 Aug 9;153(15):1791-6. Arch Intern Med. 1993. PMID: 8392831
-
Experience with long-term outpatient venous access utilizing percutaneously placed silicone elastomer catheters.Cancer. 1985 Oct 15;56(8):2074-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19851015)56:8<2074::aid-cncr2820560831>3.0.co;2-f. Cancer. 1985. PMID: 3928136
-
A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.Ann Surg Oncol. 2000 Aug;7(7):496-502. doi: 10.1007/s10434-000-0496-9. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000. PMID: 10947017 Clinical Trial.
-
Central venous catheter infections.Pediatr Clin North Am. 1988 Jun;35(3):579-612. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36473-2. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1988. PMID: 3287316 Review.
-
A review in emergency central venous catheterization.Chin J Traumatol. 2017 Jun;20(3):137-140. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 May 17. Chin J Traumatol. 2017. PMID: 28552330 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Techniques and controversies.Support Care Cancer. 1994 Nov;2(6):335-46. doi: 10.1007/BF00344046. Support Care Cancer. 1994. PMID: 7858925 Review.
-
Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.Br J Cancer. 2004 Sep 13;91(6):1045-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602082. Br J Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15316563 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Complications associated with different insertion techniques for Hickman catheters.Postgrad Med J. 1998 Feb;74(868):104-7. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.74.868.104. Postgrad Med J. 1998. PMID: 9616492 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources