Ethanol drinking microstructure of a high drinking in the dark selected mouse line
- PMID: 22524154
- PMCID: PMC3407303
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01749.x
Ethanol drinking microstructure of a high drinking in the dark selected mouse line
Abstract
Background: The High Drinking in the Dark (HDID) selected mouse line was bred for high blood ethanol (EtOH) concentration (BEC) following the limited access drinking in the dark (DID) test and is a genetic animal model of binge-like drinking. This study examines the microstructure of EtOH drinking in these mice and their control line during 3 versions of the DID test to determine how drinking structure differences might relate to overall intake and BEC.
Methods: Male mice from the HDID-1 replicate line and HS/Npt progenitor stock were tested in separate experiments on 2- and 4-day versions of the DID test, and on a 2-day 2-bottle choice DID test with 20% EtOH and water. Testing took place in home cages connected to a continuous fluid intake monitoring system, and drinking during the DID test was analyzed for drinking microstructure.
Results: HDID-1 mice had more drinking bouts, shorter interbout interval, larger bout size, greater total EtOH intake, and higher BECs than HS/Npt mice on the second day of the 2-day DID test. The 4-day DID test showed greater bout size, total EtOH intake, and BEC in the HDID-1 mice than the HS/Npt mice. Total EtOH intake and BECs for the HDID-1 mice in the DID tests averaged 2.6 to 3.0 g/kg and 0.4 to 0.5 mg/ml, respectively. The 2-bottle choice test showed no genotype differences in drinking microstructure or total consumption but did show greater preference for the EtOH solution in HDID-1 mice than HS/Npt.
Conclusions: These results suggest that inherent differences in EtOH drinking structure between the HDID-1 and HS/Npt mice, especially the larger bout size in the HDID-1 mice, contribute to the difference in intake during the standard DID test.
Copyright © 2012 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Alcohol preference drinking in a mouse line selectively bred for high drinking in the dark.Alcohol. 2011 Aug;45(5):427-40. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.12.001. Epub 2010 Dec 30. Alcohol. 2011. PMID: 21194877 Free PMC article.
-
Targeting the Glucocorticoid Receptor Reduces Binge-Like Drinking in High Drinking in the Dark (HDID-1) Mice.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 May;44(5):1025-1036. doi: 10.1111/acer.14318. Epub 2020 Mar 27. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020. PMID: 32154593 Free PMC article.
-
Distinct ethanol drinking microstructures in two replicate lines of mice selected for drinking to intoxication.Genes Brain Behav. 2015 Jun;14(5):398-410. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12225. Genes Brain Behav. 2015. PMID: 25981501 Free PMC article.
-
High drinking in the dark mice: a genetic model of drinking to intoxication.Alcohol. 2014 May;48(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2013.10.007. Epub 2013 Nov 15. Alcohol. 2014. PMID: 24360287 Free PMC article. Review.
-
"Drinking in the dark" (DID) procedures: a model of binge-like ethanol drinking in non-dependent mice.Alcohol. 2014 May;48(3):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Oct 29. Alcohol. 2014. PMID: 24275142 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Gender-Specific Effects of Selection for Drinking in the Dark on the Network Roles of Coding and Noncoding RNAs.Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Aug;42(8):1454-1465. doi: 10.1111/acer.13777. Epub 2018 Jun 22. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018. PMID: 29786871 Free PMC article.
-
On the relationships in rhesus macaques between chronic ethanol consumption and the brain transcriptome.Addict Biol. 2018 Jan;23(1):196-205. doi: 10.1111/adb.12501. Epub 2017 Feb 28. Addict Biol. 2018. PMID: 28247455 Free PMC article.
-
Ethanol-Related Behaviors in Mouse Lines Selectively Bred for Drinking to Intoxication.Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 4;11(2):189. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020189. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 33557285 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptation of the 5-choice serial reaction time task to measure engagement and motivation for alcohol in mice.Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Sep 16;16:968359. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.968359. eCollection 2022. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36187376 Free PMC article.
-
Rewarding and aversive effects of ethanol in High Drinking in the Dark selectively bred mice.Addict Biol. 2015 Jan;20(1):80-90. doi: 10.1111/adb.12079. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Addict Biol. 2015. PMID: 23910826 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Armstrong S. A chronometric approach to the study of feeding behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 1980;4(1):27–53. - PubMed
-
- Boughter JD, Jr, Baird J-P, Bryant J, St John SJ, Heck D. C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice vary in lick rate and ingestive microstructure. Genes Brain Behav. 2007;6(7):619–627. - PubMed
-
- Canu ME, Carta D, Murgia E, Serra G, D’Aquila PS. Dopamine on D2-like receptors is involved in reward evaluation in water-deprived rats licking for NaCl and water. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2010;96(2):194–197. 2010. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical