Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 May;89(5):620-31.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318251293a.

Factors associated with macular thickness in the COMET myopic cohort

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Factors associated with macular thickness in the COMET myopic cohort

Elise Harb et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether macular thickness is associated with ethnicity, gender, axial length (AL), and severity of myopia in a cohort of young adults from the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

Methods: Eleven years after their baseline visit, 387/469 (83%) subjects returned for their annual visit. In addition to the protocol-specific measures of spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) and AL, high-resolution macular imaging also was performed with optical coherence tomography (RTVue). From these scans, full-thickness values for the central (1 mm), parafoveal (1 to 3 mm), and perifoveal (3 to 5 mm) annular regions were calculated. Gender, ethnicity, AL, and SER were examined for associations with macular thickness using univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses.

Results: In the 377 subjects with usable data (mean age = 21.0 ± 1.3 years), the mean SER ± SD was -5.0 ± 1.9 D and mean AL was 25.4 ± 0.9 mm. Mean foveal thickness was 252.0 ± 20.1 μm in the center, 315.6 ± 14.0 μm in the parafovea, and 284.4 ± 12.9 μm in the perifovea. In the best-fit multivariable model that adjusted for gender, ethnicity, and AL, females had significantly thinner maculas than males for all three regions (p < 0.0001), with the largest difference in the center (12.8 μm, 95% confidence interval: 9.2 to 16.4). The effect of ethnicity was strongest in the central fovea, with African-Americans, Asians, Hispanics, and mixed ethnic groups having thinner maculas than whites (all p values < 0.005). Increased AL was significantly associated with slightly thicker central foveas (p = 0.001) and thinner parafoveal (p = 0.02) and perifoveal (p < 0.0001) regions.

Conclusions: In this ethnically diverse cohort of moderate and high myopes, females and African-Americans were found to have the thinnest central foveas. Whether such thinning in the macula as a young adult is a risk factor for future disease remains to be determined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Macular thickness measurements (mean ± SD) for each region by gender. The innermost circle represents the central 1.0 mm of the fovea, the inner ring represents the para-foveal region (1.0 – 3.0 mm), and the outer ring represents the peri-foveal region (3.0 – 5.0 mm).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Macular thickness measurements (mean ± SD) for each region (as defined in the Figure 1 caption) by ethnicity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a–c): Scatter plots of the association between macular thickness and axial length, in both males (filled circles) and females (open triangles), in the central fovea (a), para-fovea (b) and peri-fovea (c).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a–c): Scatter plots of the associations between macular thickness and spherical equivalent refractive error, in males (filled circles) and females (open triangles) in the central fovea (a), para-fovea (b) and peri-fovea (c).

References

    1. Buch H, Vinding T, La Cour M, Appleyard M, Jensen GB, Nielsen NV. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness among 9980 Scandinavian adults: the Copenhagen City Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:53–61. - PubMed
    1. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Shih-Yen EC, Chua WH. Myopia and associated pathological complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:381–391. - PubMed
    1. Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL., 3rd Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971–1972 and 1999–2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1632–1639. - PubMed
    1. Kobayashi K, Ohno-Matsui K, Kojima A, Shimada N, Yasuzumi K, Yoshida T, Futagami S, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M. Fundus characteristics of high myopia in children. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005;49:306–311. - PubMed
    1. Hayashi K, Ohno-Matsui K, Shimada N, Moriyama M, Kojima A, Hayashi W, Yasuzumi K, Nagaoka N, Saka N, Yoshida T, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M. Long-term pattern of progression of myopic maculopathy: a natural history study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1595–1611. 611 e1–4. - PubMed