Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;16(2):120-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.11.008.

Variability of angle of deviation measurements in children with intermittent exotropia

Affiliations

Variability of angle of deviation measurements in children with intermittent exotropia

Sarah R Hatt et al. J AAPOS. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Background: A change in the angle of deviation is often used to monitor the change in severity of intermittent exotropia over time; nevertheless, thresholds for a clinically significant change in angle have not been determined. We analyzed variability associated with test-retest differences and short-term variability in the condition, to provide thresholds for assessing clinically significant, long-term change in angle of intermittent exotropia.

Methods: Twenty-six children with intermittent exotropia (median age, 7; range, 1-13 years) underwent repeat prism and alternate cover test measures during 3 or 4 examinations (2 hours apart) over the course of a day; 95% repeatability coefficients were derived to determine test-retest differences at distance and near fixation.

Results: Derived 95% repeatability coefficients at distance were 3.4(Δ) (95% CI, 0.7(Δ)-6.2(Δ)) for angles ≤20(Δ) and 7.2(Δ) (95% CI, 4.4(Δ)-9.9(Δ)) for angles >20(Δ); at near, 6.6(Δ) (95% CI, 3.7(Δ)-9.6(Δ)) for angles ≤20(Δ) and 12.8(Δ) (95% CI, 5.3(Δ)-20.3(Δ)) for angles >20(Δ).

Conclusions: Test-retest reliability data in this study provide thresholds to help determine clinically significant change in angle of strabismus in children with intermittent exotropia. These data should facilitate evidence-based assessment of long-term change in intermittent exotropia over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Test–retest variability of prism and alternate cover test measurements. A, at distance fixation. B, at near fixation. Bland-Altman plot showing 95% repeatability coefficient (equivalent to 95% limits of agreement for the difference between 2 measures). Middle dotted line represents the mean of test–retest differences (0). There was significantly greater variability with larger versus smaller deviations at near (P < 0.0001) with borderline greater variability with larger angles at distance (P = 0.09).

References

    1. Romanchuk KG, Dotchin SA, Zurevinsky J. The natural history of surgically untreated intermittent exotropia—looking into the distant future. J AAPOS. 2006;10:225–231. - PubMed
    1. Nusz KJ, Mohney BG, Diehl NN. The course of intermittent exotropia in a population-based cohort. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1154–1158. - PubMed
    1. Chia A, Seenyen L, Long QB. A retrospective review of 287 consecutive children in Singapore presenting with intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 2005;9:257–263. - PubMed
    1. Hatt SR, Mohney BG, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Variability of control in intermittent exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:371–376. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hatt SR, Mohney BG, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Variability of stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:556–561. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types