Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;60(5):768-75.
doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d.

Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice

Affiliations

Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice

L Michelle Bennett et al. J Investig Med. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Interdisciplinary efforts are becoming more critical for scientific discovery and translational research efforts. Highly integrated and interactive research teams share a number of features that contribute to their success in developing and sustaining their efforts over time. Through analysis of in-depth interviews with members of highly successful research teams and others who did not meet their goals or ended because of conflicts, we identified key elements that are critical for team success and effectiveness. There is no debate that the scientific goal sits at the center of the collaborative effort. However, supporting features need to be in place to avoid the derailment of the team. Among the most important of these is trust: without trust, the team dynamic runs the risk of deteriorating over time. Other critical factors of which both leaders and participants need to be aware include developing a shared vision, strategically identifying team members and purposefully building the team, promoting disagreement while containing conflict, and setting clear expectations for sharing credit and authorship. Self-awareness and strong communication skills contribute greatly to effective leadership and management strategies of scientific teams. While all successful teams share the characteristic of effectively carrying out these activities, there is no single formula for execution with every leader exemplifying different strengths and weaknesses. Successful scientific collaborations have strong leaders who are self-aware and are mindful of the many elements critical for supporting the science at the center of the effort.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A Paper from:

Career Development Workshop: Productive Translational Research: Tools for Connecting Research Cultures and Managing Conflict.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The degrees of interaction and integration for a research team exist along a continuum extending from low levels to high levels.

References

    1. Wuchty S, Jones BF, et al. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science. 2007;316:1036–1038. - PubMed
    1. Weeks WB, Wallace AE, et al. Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals. Social Science & Medicine. 2004;59:1949–1954. - PubMed
    1. Gray B. Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1989.
    1. Abraham T. Twenty-First Century Plague: The Story of SARS. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2004.
    1. Kreimer AR, Gonzalez P, et al. "Efficacy of a bivalent HPV 16/18 vaccine against anal HPV 16/18 infection among young women: a nested analysis within the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial". The Lancet Oncology. 2011;12:862–870. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms