Does evidence permeate all surgical areas equally? Publication trends in wound care compared to breast cancer care: a longitudinal trend analysis
- PMID: 22526043
- PMCID: PMC3414698
- DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1599-8
Does evidence permeate all surgical areas equally? Publication trends in wound care compared to breast cancer care: a longitudinal trend analysis
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based decision making has permeated the daily practice of healthcare professionals. However, in wound care this seems more difficult than in other medical areas, such as breast cancer, which has a similar incidence, variety of etiologies, financial burden, and diversity of treatment options. This incongruence could be due to a lack in quantity and quality of available evidence. We therefore compared worldwide publication trends to answer whether research in wound care lags behind that in breast cancer.
Methods: In order to assess the trends in quantity and methodological quality of publications as to wound care and breast cancer treatments, we examined relevant publications over the last five decades. Publications in MEDLINE were classified into seven study design categories: (1) guidelines, (2) systematic reviews (SR), (3) randomized (RCT), and controlled clinical trials (CCT), (4) cohort studies, (5) case-control studies, (6) case series and case reports, and (7) other publications.
Results: We found a 30-fold rise in publications on wound care, versus a 70-fold increase in those on breast cancer. High-quality study designs like SR, RCT, or CCT were less frequent in wound care (difference 1.9, 95 % CI 1.8-2.0 %) as were guidelines; 76 on wound care versus 231 for breast cancer.
Conclusions: Publications on wound care fall behind in quantity and quality as compared to breast cancer. Nevertheless, SR, RCT, and CCT in wound care are becoming more numerous. These high-quality study designs could motivate clinicians to make evidence-based decisions and researchers to perform proper research in wound care.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011. PMID: 21468289 Free PMC article.
-
A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries.Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 27;7(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1. Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30261915 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do systematic reviews address community healthcare professionals' wound care uncertainties? Results from evidence mapping in wound care.PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0190045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190045. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29320522 Free PMC article.
-
The quality and utility of research in ectopic pregnancy in the last three decades: An analysis of the published literature.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Feb;245:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.022. Epub 2019 Dec 26. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 31901601 Review.
Cited by
-
Evidence-Based Care of Acute Wounds: A Perspective.Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015 May 1;4(5):286-294. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0592. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015. PMID: 26005594 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Hospital Volume on the Outcomes of Renal Trauma Management.Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Feb 8;37:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.004. eCollection 2022 Mar. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 35243394 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Committee on Quality of Health Care in America IoM (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new healthcare system for the 21st century. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10027 Accessed 2-1-2012
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials