Complications of immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapy in neurological diseases
- PMID: 22528294
- PMCID: PMC4910875
- DOI: 10.1007/s11940-012-0172-y
Complications of immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory therapy in neurological diseases
Abstract
The first critical step in the appropriate treatment of neurological infectious disease accompanying immunosuppressive states or immunomodulatory medication is to properly identify the offending organism. Broadly immunosuppressive conditions will predispose to both common and uncommon infectious diseases. There are substantial differences between neurological infectious disorders complicating disturbances of the innate immunity (neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages) and those due to abnormal adaptive immunity (humoral and cellular immunity). Similarly, there are differences in the types of infections with impaired humoral immunity compared to disturbed cellular immunity and between T- and B-cell disorders. HIV/AIDS has been a model of acquired immunosuppression and the nature of opportunistic infections with which it has been associated has been well characterized and generally correlates well with the degree of CD4 lymphopenia. Increasingly, immunotherapies target specific components of the immune system, such as an adhesion molecule or its ligand or surface receptors on a special class of cells. These targeted perturbations of the immune system increase the risk of particular infectious diseases. For instance, natalizumab, an α4β1 integrin inhibitor that is highly effective in multiple sclerosis, increases the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy for reasons that still remain unclear. It is likely that other therapies that result in a disruption of a specific component of the immune system will be associated with other unique opportunistic infections. The risk of multiple simultaneous neurological infections in the immunosuppressed host must always be considered, particularly with a failure to respond to a therapeutic regimen. With respect to appropriate and effective therapy, diagnostic accuracy assumes primacy, but occasionally broad spectrum therapy is necessitated. For a number of opportunistic infectious disorders, particularly some viral and fungal diseases, antimicrobial therapy remains inadequate.
References
-
- Berger JR. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and newer biological agents. Drug Saf. 2010;33(11):969–83. This article addresses the risk of PML with the newer biological agents and describe potential mechanisms by which these therapies may predispose to the development of this disorder. - PubMed
-
- Fox R. Advances in the management of PML: focus on natalizumab. Cleve Clin J Med. 2011;78(Suppl 2):S33–7. - PubMed
-
- BiogenIdec. [Accessed January 7, 2012];Tysabri Update. 2011 https://medinfo.biogenidec.com.
-
- Clifford DB, De Luca A, Simpson DM, Arendt G, Giovannoni G, Nath A. Natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis: lessons from 28 cases. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(4):438–46. This is an excellent description of the first cases of natalizumab-associated PML focusing on the clinical and radiographic manifestations and demonstrating a high rate of concomitant IRIS. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials