Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;27(8):985-91.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research

Affiliations

A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research

Thomas W Concannon et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Despite widespread agreement that stakeholder engagement is needed in patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR), no taxonomy exists to guide researchers and policy makers on how to address this need. We followed an iterative process, including several stages of stakeholder review, to address three questions: (1) Who are the stakeholders in PCOR? (2) What roles and responsibilities can stakeholders have in PCOR? (3) How can researchers start engaging stakeholders? We introduce a flexible taxonomy called the 7Ps of Stakeholder Engagement and Six Stages of Research for identifying stakeholders and developing engagement strategies across the full spectrum of research activities. The path toward engagement will not be uniform across every research program, but this taxonomy offers a common starting point and a flexible approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The Six-Stage Model for PCOR and CER. This model illustrates six stages in the translational spectrum of comparative effectiveness research (CER). Each stage is an activity that may be carried out by researchers and research organizations, as illustrated by the light-shaded oval. Researchers and research organizations are surrounded by stakeholders, as illustrated by the dark-shaded oval. The model illustrates both a sequential flow from evidence prioritization to feedback and assessment as well as a cyclical, iterative process. *©2012 Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute

References

    1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zilberberg MD. The clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2011;305:604–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.104. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care. JAMA. 2001;286:2578–85. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.20.2578. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rothwell PM. Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet. 2005;365:176–86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17709-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rothwell PM, Mehta Z, Howard SC, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP. Treating individuals 3: from subgroups to individuals: General principles and the example of carotid endarterectomy. Lancet. 2005;365:256–65. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources