Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;52(4):250-3.
doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.93798.

Socioeconomic consequences of HIV/AIDS in the family system

P Taraphdar  1 , Rray T Guha, D Haldar, A Chatterjee, A Dasgupta, B Saha, S Mallik
Affiliations

Socioeconomic consequences of HIV/AIDS in the family system

P Taraphdar et al. Niger Med J. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: HIV/AIDS can lead to poverty affecting particularly women and young people and can halt or reverse socioeconomic development of a country.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the socioeconomic consequences of HIV/AIDS within the family.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out among patients admitted in in-patient department and those attending integrated counseling and testing centre (ICTC) of School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata. Data were gathered by interviewing the patients by using a predesigned questionnaire.

Results: For prolonged duration and severity of disease, higher proportion of indoor patients reported loss of job, decreased family income, increased expenditure for care seeking, and faced greater economic consequences, reflected by selling assets. Loss of job was mainly due to illness (86.8%), disclosure of sero-status (13.2%), and predominantly among skilled workers. Assets were sold mainly to meet the cost of own illness for indoor patients, but more to meet the expenditure for husband's illness, in the case of ICTC patients. High school dropout seen in both groups was mainly due to economic reasons. HIV/AIDS status was known to other members of family for 84.8% of indoor patients out of which 15.4% experienced rejection by family members. Out of 72 ever married women indoor patients whose in-laws were aware of their HIV/AIDS status, 41.7%, 40.9%, and 33.33% reportedly were blamed for spouse's illness, and had strained relation with in-laws and spouse, respectively.

Conclusion: Intensive behavior change communication and provision of care and support are required to curb AIDS-related stigma, discrimination, and to maintain physical, mental, and social wellbeing of people living with HIV/AIDS.

Keywords: HIV/AIDS; people living with HIV/AIDS; sero-status; socioeconomic consequences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Population, reproductive rights and reproductive health with special reference to HIV/AIDS – A concise report, United Nations. New York: Department of Economic and Social affairs, Population Division. 2004. [Accessed on 24.01.2008]. Available from: http://www.amazon.com/Population-Reproductive-Rights-Special-Reference/d... .
    1. Sexual health exchange. [Last accessed on 2006, Jan24]. Available from: http:// www.kit.nl/exchange2003/1: 15-6 .
    1. ILO project – Assigning the socio economic impact of HIV/AIDS on PLWHAS and their families in India – undertaken. [Last accessed on 2006 Jan 24]. Available from: http://www.ilo.org .
    1. Nandakumar AK, Schreider P, Butera D, Pitayanom S, Kongslin S, Wattana S. Use and expenditures on out patient health care by a sample of HIV positive individuals in Rwanda. Paper presented at the International AIDS Economic Network (IAEN) Symposium on the economics of AIDS. Durban, South Africa; 2000. Population Bulletin. 2002;57:22.
    1. Bharat S. Facing the challenge household and community response to HIV/AIDS in Mumbai, India (Executive Summary) In: Agarwal OP, Sharma AK, Indrayan A, editors. HIV/AIDS Research in India. New Delhi: National AIDS Control Organization, Ministry of Health and Family Welfar; 1997. pp. 372–5.