Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr 24:7:37.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.

Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

James Cane  1 , Denise O'Connor, Susan Michie
Affiliations

Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research

James Cane et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: An integrative theoretical framework, developed for cross-disciplinary implementation and other behaviour change research, has been applied across a wide range of clinical situations. This study tests the validity of this framework.

Methods: Validity was investigated by behavioural experts sorting 112 unique theoretical constructs using closed and open sort tasks. The extent of replication was tested by Discriminant Content Validation and Fuzzy Cluster Analysis.

Results: There was good support for a refinement of the framework comprising 14 domains of theoretical constructs (average silhouette value 0.29): 'Knowledge', 'Skills', 'Social/Professional Role and Identity', 'Beliefs about Capabilities', 'Optimism', 'Beliefs about Consequences', 'Reinforcement', 'Intentions', 'Goals', 'Memory, Attention and Decision Processes', 'Environmental Context and Resources', 'Social Influences', 'Emotions', and 'Behavioural Regulation'.

Conclusions: The refined Theoretical Domains Framework has a strengthened empirical base and provides a method for theoretically assessing implementation problems, as well as professional and other health-related behaviours as a basis for intervention development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps taken to validate the Theoretical Domains Framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of fit across 2–18 cluster solutions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Clinical Effectiveness Research Agenda Group (CERAG) An Implementation Research Agenda: A report prepared for the High Level Group on Clinical Effectiveness. CERAG, London; 2008.
    1. World Health Authority (WHA) World Health Assembly Resolution 51.12: Health Promotion. 2010. Accessed from [ http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/wha51-12/en/], 27th July 2010.
    1. Newman M, Papadopoulous L, Sigsworth J. Barriers to evidence-based practice. Clin Eff Nurs. 1998;2:11–18. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9004(98)80080-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKenna H, Ashton S, Keeney S. Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004;41:369–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.10.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types