Diagnostic value of single complete compression ultrasonography in pregnant and postpartum women with suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective study
- PMID: 22531869
- PMCID: PMC3339806
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e2635
Diagnostic value of single complete compression ultrasonography in pregnant and postpartum women with suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective study
Abstract
Objective: To assess the safety of using single complete compression ultrasonography in pregnant and postpartum women to rule out deep vein thrombosis.
Design: Prospective outcome study.
Setting: Two tertiary care centres and 18 private practices specialising in vascular medicine in France and Switzerland.
Participants: 226 pregnant and postpartum women referred for suspected deep vein thrombosis.
Methods: A single proximal and distal compression ultrasonography was performed. All women with a negative complete compression ultrasonography result did not receive anticoagulant therapy and were followed up for a three month period.
Main outcome measures: Symptoms of venous thromboembolism, second compression ultrasonography or chest imaging, a thromboembolic event, and anticoagulant treatment.
Results: 16 women were excluded, mainly because of associated suspected pulmonary embolism. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed in 22 out of the 210 included women (10.5%). 10 patients received full dose anticoagulation despite a negative test result during follow-up. Of the 177 patients without deep vein thrombosis and who did not receive full dose anticoagulant therapy, two (1.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.3% to 4.0%) had an objectively confirmed deep vein thrombosis during follow-up.
Conclusions: The rate of venous thromboembolic events after single complete compression ultrasonography in pregnant and postpartum women seems to be within the range of that observed in studies in the non-pregnant population. These data suggest that a negative single complete compression ultrasonography result may safely exclude the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in this setting.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00740454.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
References
-
- Hull RD, Raskob GE, Carter CJ. Serial impedance plethysmography in pregnant patients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Clinical validity of negative findings. Ann Intern Med 1990;112:663-7. - PubMed
-
- Chan WS, Ginsberg JS. Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a study in extrapolation or a science in evolution? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2009;7:1479-82. - PubMed
-
- Hull R, Hirsh J, Sackett DL, Taylor DW, Carter C, Turpie AG, et al. Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis. Circulation 1981;64:622-5. - PubMed
-
- Heijboer H, Buller HR, Lensing AW, Turpie AG, Colly LP, ten Cate JW. A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1365-9. - PubMed
-
- Righini M, Perrier A, De Moerloose P, Bounameaux H. D-Dimer for venous thromboembolism diagnosis: 20 years later. J Thromb Haemost 2008;6:1059-71. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical