Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 6:5:194.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-194.

Trace elements as tumor biomarkers and prognostic factors in breast cancer: a study through energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence

Affiliations

Trace elements as tumor biomarkers and prognostic factors in breast cancer: a study through energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence

Marina P Silva et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: The application and better understanding of traditional and new breast tumor biomarkers and prognostic factors are increasing due to the fact that they are able to identify individuals at high risk of breast cancer, who may benefit from preventive interventions. Also, biomarkers can make possible for physicians to design an individualized treatment for each patient. Previous studies showed that trace elements (TEs) determined by X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) techniques are found in significantly higher concentrations in neoplastic breast tissues (malignant and benign) when compared with normal tissues. The aim of this work was to evaluate the potential of TEs, determined by the use of the Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) technique, as biomarkers and prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Methods: By using EDXRF, we determined Ca, Fe, Cu, and Zn trace elements concentrations in 106 samples of normal and breast cancer tissues. Cut-off values for each TE were determined through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis from the TEs distributions. These values were used to set the positive or negative expression. This expression was subsequently correlated with clinical prognostic factors through Fisher's exact test and chi-square test. Kaplan Meier survival curves were also evaluated to assess the effect of the expression of TEs in the overall patient survival.

Results: Concentrations of TEs are higher in neoplastic tissues (malignant and benign) when compared with normal tissues. Results from ROC analysis showed that TEs can be considered a tumor biomarker because, after establishing a cut-off value, it was possible to classify different tissues as normal or neoplastic, as well as different types of cancer.The expression of TEs was found statistically correlated with age and menstrual status. The survival curves estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method showed that patients with positive expression for Cu presented a poor overall survival (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study suggests that TEs expression has a great potential of application as a tumor biomarker, once it was revealed to be an effective tool to distinguish different types of breast tissues and to identify the difference between malignant and benign tumors. The expressions of all TEs were found statistically correlated with well-known prognostic factors for breast cancer. The element copper also showed statistical correlation with overall survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical EDXRF breast cancer spectrum.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curves obtained from the study of trace element concentration distributions. Group 1: malignant and normal adjacent, group 2: malignant and normal, group 3: benign and normal, group 4: benign and malignant. Reference lines are shown in dotted lines.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box plots of trace elements in different breast tissues. (a) normal adjacent and malignant (b) normal and malignant (c) normal and benign and (d) malignant and benign. The circles indicate outliers, which are values between 1.5 and 3 times the inter quartile ranges. Color dotted lines represent the cut-off values for each correspondent color distribution.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival curves as a function of trace elements expression.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, Thor AD, Allred C, Clark GM, Ruby SC, O’Malley F, Sinpson LF, Connolly JL. et al.Prognostic factors in breast cancer-College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):966–978. - PubMed
    1. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human-Breast Cancer-Correlation of Relapse and Survival with Amplification of the Her-2 Neu Oncogene. Science. 1987;235(4785):177–182. doi: 10.1126/science.3798106. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gasparini G. Prognostic Value of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(suppl 1):37–44. - PubMed
    1. Thor AD, Moore DH, Edgerton SM, Kawasaki ES, Reihsaus E, Lynch HT, Marcus JN, Schwartz L, Chen LC, Mayall BH. et al.Accumulation of P53 Tumor Suppressor Gene Protein-an Independent Marker of Prognosis in Breast Cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84(11):845–855. doi: 10.1093/jnci/84.11.845. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dowsett M, Dunbier AK. Emerging Biomarkers and New Understanding of Traditional Markers in Personalized Therapy for Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(24):8019–8026. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0974. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types