Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr 24;2(2):e000652.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000652. Print 2012.

The FEeding Support Team (FEST) randomised, controlled feasibility trial of proactive and reactive telephone support for breastfeeding women living in disadvantaged areas

Pat Hoddinott  1 , Leone Craig, Graeme Maclennan, Dwayne Boyers, Luke Vale; NHS Grampian and the University of Aberdeen FEST Project Team
Affiliations

The FEeding Support Team (FEST) randomised, controlled feasibility trial of proactive and reactive telephone support for breastfeeding women living in disadvantaged areas

Pat Hoddinott et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of implementing a dedicated feeding support team on a postnatal ward and pilot the potential effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of team (proactive) and woman-initiated (reactive) telephone support after discharge.

Design: Randomised controlled trial embedded within a before-and-after study. Participatory approach and mixed-method process evaluation.

Setting: A postnatal ward in Scotland.

Sample: Women living in disadvantaged areas initiating breast feeding.

Methods: Eligible women were recruited to a before-and-after intervention study, a proportion of whom were independently randomised after hospital discharge to intervention: daily proactive and reactive telephone calls for ≤14 days or control: reactive telephone calls ≤ day 14. Intention-to-treat analysis compared the randomised groups on cases with complete outcomes at follow-up.

Primary outcome: any breast feeding at 6-8 weeks assessed by a telephone call from a researcher blind to group allocation.

Secondary outcomes: exclusive breast feeding, satisfaction with care, NHS costs and cost per additional woman breast feeding.

Results: There was no difference in feeding outcomes for women initiating breast feeding before the intervention (n=413) and after (n=388). 69 women were randomised to telephone support: 35 intervention (32 complete cases) and 34 control (26 complete cases). 22 intervention women compared with 12 control women were giving their baby some breast milk (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.40) and 17 intervention women compared with eight control women were exclusively breast feeding (RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.88 to 3.37) at 6-8 weeks after birth. The incremental cost of providing proactive calls was £87 per additional woman breast feeding and £91 per additional woman exclusively breast feeding at 6-8 weeks; costs were sensitive to service organisation.

Conclusions: Proactive telephone care delivered by a dedicated feeding team shows promise as a cost-effective intervention for improving breastfeeding outcomes. Integrating the FEeding Support Team (FEST) intervention into routine postnatal care was feasible.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN27207603. The study protocol and final report are available on request.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
FEeding Support Team randomised controlled trial flow chart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/global_strategy/en/index.html (accessed Feb 2012).
    1. Chung M, Raman G, Trikalinos T, et al. Interventions in primary care to promote breastfeeding: an evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:565–82 - PubMed
    1. Britton C, McCormick FM, Renfrew MJ, et al. Support for breastfeeding mothers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(1):CD001141. - PubMed
    1. Hoddinott P, Seyara R, Marais D. Global evidence synthesis and UK idiosyncrasy: why have recent UK trials had no significant effects on breastfeeding rates? Matern Child Nutr 2011;7:221–7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graffy J, Taylor J. What information, advice, and support do women want with breastfeeding? Birth 2005;32:179–86 - PubMed