Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:5:77-84.
doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S27572. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

Evaluation of deficiencies in current discharge summaries for dialysis patients in Canada

Ziv Harel  1 , Ron Wald, Jeff Perl, Daniel Schwartz, Chaim M Bell
Affiliations

Evaluation of deficiencies in current discharge summaries for dialysis patients in Canada

Ziv Harel et al. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2012.

Abstract

Background: Deficits in the transfer of information between inpatient and outpatient physicians are common and pose a patient safety risk. This is particularly the case for vulnerable populations such as patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. These patients have unique and complex health care needs that may not be effectively communicated on standard discharge summaries, which may result in potential medical errors and adverse events.

Objective: To evaluate Canadian dialysis center directors' perceptions of deficiencies in the content and quality of hospital discharge summaries for dialysis patients.

Methods: A web-based, cross-sectional survey of Canadian dialysis center directors was performed between September and November 2010. The survey consisted of three parts. The first part was designed to assess dialysis center directors' attitudes on the quality of discharge summaries they receive. The second part was designed to elicit respondents' preferences for discharge summary content, and the third part consisted of questions regarding demographic and practice information.

Results: Of 79 dialysis center directors, 21 (27%) completed the survey. Sixty-two percent felt that current discharge summaries inadequately communicate dialysis-specific information. Receipt of antibiotics for line sepsis or peritonitis, modifications to vascular access, and changes in target weight/dialysis prescription were rated as essential dialysis-specific information to include in discharge summaries by respondents.

Conclusion: Over three quarters of dialysis center directors find the current practice of transferring discharge information for hospitalized dialysis patients grossly inadequate. The inclusion of dialysis-specific information may improve the quality of discharge summaries for dialysis patients.

Keywords: dialysis patients; discharge information; information transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327(7425):1219–1221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C, et al. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA. 2005;293(5):565–571. - PubMed
    1. Stiell AP, Forster AJ, Stiell IG, van WC. Maintaining continuity of care: a look at the quality of communication between Ontario emergency departments and community physicians. CJEM. 2005;7(3):155–161. - PubMed
    1. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. Adverse drug events occurring following hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(4):317–323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forster AJ, Rose NG, van WC, Stiell I. Adverse events following an emergency department visit. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(1):17–22. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources