Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 28;13 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S13.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-S4-S13.

Design of a multi-signature ensemble classifier predicting neuroblastoma patients' outcome

Affiliations

Design of a multi-signature ensemble classifier predicting neuroblastoma patients' outcome

Andrea Cornero et al. BMC Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Background: Neuroblastoma is the most common pediatric solid tumor of the sympathetic nervous system. Development of improved predictive tools for patients stratification is a crucial requirement for neuroblastoma therapy. Several studies utilized gene expression-based signatures to stratify neuroblastoma patients and demonstrated a clear advantage of adding genomic analysis to risk assessment. There is little overlapping among signatures and merging their prognostic potential would be advantageous. Here, we describe a new strategy to merge published neuroblastoma related gene signatures into a single, highly accurate, Multi-Signature Ensemble (MuSE)-classifier of neuroblastoma (NB) patients outcome.

Methods: Gene expression profiles of 182 neuroblastoma tumors, subdivided into three independent datasets, were used in the various phases of development and validation of neuroblastoma NB-MuSE-classifier. Thirty three signatures were evaluated for patients' outcome prediction using 22 classification algorithms each and generating 726 classifiers and prediction results. The best-performing algorithm for each signature was selected, validated on an independent dataset and the 20 signatures performing with an accuracy > = 80% were retained.

Results: We combined the 20 predictions associated to the corresponding signatures through the selection of the best performing algorithm into a single outcome predictor. The best performance was obtained by the Decision Table algorithm that produced the NB-MuSE-classifier characterized by an external validation accuracy of 94%. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test demonstrated that patients with good and poor outcome prediction by the NB-MuSE-classifier have a significantly different survival (p < 0.0001). Survival curves constructed on subgroups of patients divided on the bases of known prognostic marker suggested an excellent stratification of localized and stage 4s tumors but more data are needed to prove this point.

Conclusions: The NB-MuSE-classifier is based on an ensemble approach that merges twenty heterogeneous, neuroblastoma-related gene signatures to blend their discriminating power, rather than numeric values, into a single, highly accurate patients' outcome predictor. The novelty of our approach derives from the way to integrate the gene expression signatures, by optimally associating them with a single paradigm ultimately integrated into a single classifier. This model can be exported to other types of cancer and to diseases for which dedicated databases exist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
NB-MuSE-classifier construction. Workflow of the steps involved in the construction of the NB-MuSE classifier merging the information of 20 signatures matched to the optimal paradigm for outcome classification. The process can be subdivided into three main phases: 1) single signature classifiers generation, 2) classifiers filtering on performance features and, 3) Neuroblastoma Multi-Signature Ensemble classifier (NB-MuSE-classifier) training and validation. The dataset was subdivided into three different subsets: DS1(60 patients) to train the signatures, DS2 (60 patients) to externally validate single-signature classifiers and to train the NB-MuSE-classifier, and DS3(62 patients) to externally validate the NB-MuSE-classifier. The products of the procedure are indicated on the right side of the figure. 60 fold cross validation refers to leave one out cross-validation (LOOCV).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of the multistep classifier generation process. The accuracy of NB-Muse classifier was measured when the selection and/or classification steps were omitted from the procedure. The four resulting possible conditions are indicated with letters from A to C as detailed in the figure. The percent accuracy for each condition is shown in the corresponding bar.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis of patients stratified according to the NB-MuSE classifier. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis for the 62 neuroblastoma patients belonging to the external validation dataset. 5-years overall survival (A) and event free survival (B) of patients stratified according to the NB-MuSE classifier. Red and black curves represent poor and good outcome patients respectively. The p-value of the log-rank test is shown.

References

    1. De Preter K, Vandesompele J, Heimann P, Yigit N, Beckman S, Schramm A, Eggert A, Stallings R, Benoit Y, Renard M, De Paepe A, Laureys G, Pahlman S, Speleman F. Human fetal neuroblast and neuroblastoma transcriptome analysis confirms neuroblast origin and highlights neuroblastoma candidate genes. Genome Biology. 2006;7:R84. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r84. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haupt R, Garaventa A, Gambini C, Parodi S, Cangemi G, Casale F, Viscardi E, Bianchi M, Prete A, Jenkner A, Luksch R, Di Cataldo A, Favre C, D'Angelo P, Zanazzo GA, Arcamone G, Izzi GC, Gigliotti AR, Pastore G, De Bernardi B. Improved survival of children with neuroblastoma between 1979 and 2005: a report of the Italian Neuroblastoma Registry. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2331–2338. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8351. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doroshow JH. Selecting systemic cancer therapy one patient at a time: is there a role for molecular profiling of individual patients with advanced solid tumors? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4869–4871. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1472. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wei J, Greer B, Westermann F, Steinberg S, Son C, Chen Q, Whiteford C, Bilke S, Krasnoselsky A, Cenacchi N, Catchpoole D, Berthold F, Schwab M, Khan J. Prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks for patients with neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6883–6891. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0695. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schramm A, Schulte JH, Klein-Hitpass L, Havers W, Sieverts H, Berwanger B, Christiansen H, Warnat P, Brors B, Eils J, Eils R, Eggert A. Prediction of clinical outcome and biological characterization of neuroblastoma by expression profiling. Oncogene. 2005;24:7902–7912. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208936. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types