Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;23(9):1221-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1736-9. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse

Affiliations

Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse

Philipp T Gotthart et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: A presumed high failure rate of conventional procedures for prolapse has been part of the rationale for new surgical approaches. The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to estimate the reoperation rate for prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse.

Methods: We identified all patients who underwent primary surgery for prolapse at four large regional centers in Austria in 1997 and 1998. Hospital databases were searched to determine whether patients had been reoperated for prolapse through 2008.

Results: A total of 456 patients underwent a primary operation for prolapse in 1997 and 1998. The most common primary operation was vaginal hysterectomy with colporrhaphy (89 %). We identified 13 reoperations for prolapse, for a 10-year reoperation rate of (at least) 2.9 %. The median interval between primary and secondary surgery was 5.5 years (range 1.5-10 years).

Conclusion: The reoperation rate for prolapse after primary vaginal hysterectomy and colporrhaphy appears to be modest in this series of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):555.e1-5 - PubMed
    1. BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):135-43 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;185(6):1299-304; discussion 1304-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):372-7; discussion 377-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):795-806 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources