Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;27(9):1150-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2051-3. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians

Jane Zapka  1 , Carrie N Klabunde, Stephen Taplin, Gigi Yuan, David Ransohoff, Sarah Kobrin
Affiliations

Screening colonoscopy in the US: attitudes and practices of primary care physicians

Jane Zapka et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Rising colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in the last decade are attributable almost entirely to increased colonoscopy use. Little is known about factors driving the increase, but primary care physicians (PCPs) play a central role in CRC screening delivery.

Objective: Explore PCP attitudes toward screening colonoscopy and their associations with CRC screening practice patterns.

Design: Cross-sectional analysis of data from a nationally representative survey conducted in 2006-2007.

Participants: 1,266 family physicians, general practitioners, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Main measures: Physician-reported changes in the volume of screening tests ordered, performed or supervised in the past 3 years, attitudes toward colonoscopy, the influence of evidence and perceived norms on their recommendations, challenges to screening, and practice characteristics.

Results: The cooperation rate (excludes physicians without valid contact information) was 75%; 28% reported their volume of FOBT ordering had increased substantially or somewhat, and the majority (53%) reported their sigmoidoscopy volume decreased either substantially or somewhat. A majority (73%) reported that colonoscopy volume increased somewhat or substantially. The majority (86%) strongly agreed that colonoscopy was the best of the available CRC screening tests; 69% thought it was readily available for their patients; 59% strongly or somewhat agreed that they might be sued if they did not offer colonoscopy to their patients. All three attitudes were significantly related to substantial increases in colonoscopy ordering.

Conclusions: PCPs report greatly increased colonoscopy recommendation relative to other screening tests, and highly favorable attitudes about colonoscopy. Greater emphasis is needed on informed decision-making with patients about preferences for test options.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Reported change over the past 3 years in volume of CRC screening procedures that PCPs order, perform, or supervise.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PCPs’ attitudes about screening colonoscopy.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Reported change over past 3 years in volume of colonoscopy ordering by strong agreement with three attitude items.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–141. - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality2008. Report No.: AHRQ Publication 08-05124-EF-3.
    1. Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Adults Aged 50-75 United States 2008. MMWR Vital Signs. 2010;59:808-12. - PubMed
    1. Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:663–667. - PubMed
    1. Phillips KA, Liang SY, Ladabaum U, et al. Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Med Care. 2007;45:160–167. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000246612.35245.21. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types