Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):684-7.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000878. Epub 2012 Apr 29.

Using EHRs to integrate research with patient care: promises and challenges

Affiliations

Using EHRs to integrate research with patient care: promises and challenges

Chunhua Weng et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Clinical research is the foundation for advancing the practice of medicine. However, the lack of seamless integration between clinical research and patient care workflow impedes recruitment efficiency, escalates research costs, and hence threatens the entire clinical research enterprise. Increased use of electronic health records (EHRs) holds promise for facilitating this integration but must surmount regulatory obstacles. Among the unintended consequences of current research oversight are barriers to accessing patient information for prescreening and recruitment, coordinating scheduling of clinical and research visits, and reconciling information about clinical and research drugs. We conclude that the EHR alone cannot overcome barriers in conducting clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research. Patient privacy and human subject protection policies should be clarified at the local level to exploit optimally the full potential of EHRs, while continuing to ensure participant safety. Increased alignment of policies that regulate the clinical and research use of EHRs could help fulfill the vision of more efficiently obtaining clinical research evidence to improve human health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Mitka M. US government kicks off program for comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 2010;304:2230–1 - PubMed
    1. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Jr, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 2003;289:1278–87 - PubMed
    1. Mosis G, Dieleman JP, Stricker BC, et al. A randomized database study in general practice yielded quality data but patient recruitment in routine consultation was not practical. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:497–502 - PubMed
    1. Khan SA, Kukafka R, Bigger JT, et al. Re-engineering opportunities in clinical research using workflow analysis in community practice settings. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:363–7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis J. Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine, Institute of Medicine: Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary. Institute of Medicine of The National Academies, Washington DC; 2007 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms