How the Bayesians got their beliefs (and what those beliefs actually are): comment on Bowers and Davis (2012)
- PMID: 22545687
- DOI: 10.1037/a0026884
How the Bayesians got their beliefs (and what those beliefs actually are): comment on Bowers and Davis (2012)
Abstract
Bowers and Davis (2012) criticize Bayesian modelers for telling "just so" stories about cognition and neuroscience. Their criticisms are weakened by not giving an accurate characterization of the motivation behind Bayesian modeling or the ways in which Bayesian models are used and by not evaluating this theoretical framework against specific alternatives. We address these points by clarifying our beliefs about the goals and status of Bayesian models and by identifying what we view as the unique merits of the Bayesian approach.
2012 APA, all rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Is that what Bayesians believe? reply to Griffiths, Chater, Norris, and Pouget (2012).Psychol Bull. 2012 May;138(3):423-6. doi: 10.1037/a0027750. Psychol Bull. 2012. PMID: 22545688
Comment on
-
Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.Psychol Bull. 2012 May;138(3):389-414. doi: 10.1037/a0026450. Psychol Bull. 2012. PMID: 22545686
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources