Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;22(9):2020-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2455-9. Epub 2012 May 2.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the active second stage of labour: proof of principle

Affiliations

Magnetic resonance imaging of the active second stage of labour: proof of principle

F V Güttler et al. Eur Radiol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To prove that magnetic resonance imaging of foetal anatomy during the active second stage of vaginal delivery is feasible.

Materials and methods: Initially, five pregnant volunteers around the 30th week of gestation were examined in an open MRI. Based on the findings, one vaginal delivery was acquired under real-time imaging. To monitor the birth status during image acquisition, an MR-compatible wireless cardiotocography (CTG) system was built. Single-shot sequence parameters were optimised to compensate motion artefacts during labour.

Results: Safety requirements to monitor the birth process under real-time MR imaging were met. High-resolution MR images were acquired immediately before and after delivery. In one patient, TSE single-shot cinematic sequences of the active second stage of labour were obtained. All sequences were adapted to tolerate movement of the mother and infant, as well as residual noise from the CTG. Furthermore, the MR imaging during labour showed only minor image artefacts.

Conclusion: CTG-monitored acquisition of MRI series during the active second stage of delivery is feasible. Image quality should allow various further studies to improve models for birth simulation as well as potential investigation of obstructed labour and obstetric complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994 Mar;44(3):289-94 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1998 Feb;206(2):549-54 - PubMed
    1. Prenat Diagn. 1998 Nov;18(11):1149-54 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):26-30 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Sep 10;110(1):39-42 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources