Peer review

No authors listed

Comment

No authors listed. JAMA. 1990.

. 1990 Dec 26;264(24):3142-3.

No abstract available

Comment on

What do peer reviewers do?
Lock S, Smith J. Lock S, et al. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1341-3. JAMA. 1990. PMID: 2304211
Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem.
Evans JT, Nadjari HI, Burchell SA. Evans JT, et al. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1353-4. JAMA. 1990. PMID: 2304213

A proposal for an 'equal peer-review' statement.
Moustafa K. Moustafa K. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Aug;36(8):494-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 22. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26112779
The peer-review process of the Journal of Neurosurgery.
Firlik KS, Firlik AD. Firlik KS, et al. J Neurosurg. 1999 Feb;90(2):364-70. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.2.0364. J Neurosurg. 1999. PMID: 9950511 Review.
Guarding the guardians: research on editorial peer review. Selected proceedings from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. May 10-12, 1989, Chicago, Ill.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1317-1441. JAMA. 1990. PMID: 2304208 No abstract available.
Pros and cons of open peer review.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Nat Neurosci. 1999 Mar;2(3):197-8. doi: 10.1038/6295. Nat Neurosci. 1999. PMID: 10195206 No abstract available.
A review of peer review.
Manske PR. Manske PR. J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Sep;22(5):767-71. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(97)80067-6. J Hand Surg Am. 1997. PMID: 9410930 Review. No abstract available.