Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing
- PMID: 22551906
- PMCID: PMC3538476
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.011
Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of self-collected and health care worker (HCW)-collected nasal swabs for detection of influenza viruses and determine the patients' preference for type of collection.
Patients and methods: We enrolled adult patients presenting with influenzalike illness to the Emergency Department at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, from January 28, 2011, through April 30, 2011. Patients self-collected a midturbinate nasal flocked swab from their right nostril following written instructions. A second swab was then collected by an HCW from the left nostril. Swabs were tested for influenza A and B viruses by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and percent concordance between collection methods was determined.
Results: Of the 72 paired specimens analyzed, 25 were positive for influenza A or B RNA by at least one of the collection methods (34.7% positivity rate). When the 14 patients who had prior health care training were excluded, the qualitative agreement between collection methods was 94.8% (55 of 58). Two of the 58 specimens (3.4%) from patients without health care training were positive only by HCW collection, and 1 of 58 (1.7%) was positive only by patient self-collection. A total of 53.4% of patients (31 of 58) preferred the self-collection method over the HCW collection, and 25.9% (15 of 58) had no preference.
Conclusion: Self-collected midturbinate nasal swabs provide a reliable alternative to HCW collection for influenza A and B virus real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.
Copyright © 2012 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures


References
-
- Harper S.A., Fukuda K., Uyeki T.M., Cox N.J., Bridges C.B. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-8):1–40. - PubMed
-
- Aoki F.Y., Boivin G. Influenza virus shedding: excretion patterns and effects of antiviral treatment. J Clin Virol. 2009;44(4):255–261. - PubMed
-
- Poland G.A., Tosh P., Jacobson R.M. Requiring influenza vaccination for health care workers: seven truths we must accept. Vaccine. 2005;23(17-18):2251–2255. - PubMed
-
- Weingarten S., Riedinger M., Bolton L.B., Miles P., Ault M. Barriers to influenza vaccine acceptance: a survey of physicians and nurses. Am J Infect Control. 1989;17(4):202–207. - PubMed
-
- Bridges C.B., Kuehnert M.J., Hall C.B. Transmission of influenza: implications for control in health care settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(8):1094–1101. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous