Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jun;87(6):548-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 May 1.

Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effectiveness of patient-collected swabs for influenza testing

Neelam Dhiman et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of self-collected and health care worker (HCW)-collected nasal swabs for detection of influenza viruses and determine the patients' preference for type of collection.

Patients and methods: We enrolled adult patients presenting with influenzalike illness to the Emergency Department at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, from January 28, 2011, through April 30, 2011. Patients self-collected a midturbinate nasal flocked swab from their right nostril following written instructions. A second swab was then collected by an HCW from the left nostril. Swabs were tested for influenza A and B viruses by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and percent concordance between collection methods was determined.

Results: Of the 72 paired specimens analyzed, 25 were positive for influenza A or B RNA by at least one of the collection methods (34.7% positivity rate). When the 14 patients who had prior health care training were excluded, the qualitative agreement between collection methods was 94.8% (55 of 58). Two of the 58 specimens (3.4%) from patients without health care training were positive only by HCW collection, and 1 of 58 (1.7%) was positive only by patient self-collection. A total of 53.4% of patients (31 of 58) preferred the self-collection method over the HCW collection, and 25.9% (15 of 58) had no preference.

Conclusion: Self-collected midturbinate nasal swabs provide a reliable alternative to HCW collection for influenza A and B virus real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient instructions for midturbinate nasal swab collection.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Proposed model for patient-collected midturbinate nasal swabs for influenza polymerase chain reaction assay. An influenzalike illness (A) prompts the patient to call the Nurse Triage Center (B), where a nurse assesses the patient's condition via a standardized phone questionnaire. If eligible, the patient is offered the opportunity to self-collect a nasal swab in lieu of an office visit. A prescription for oseltamivir is generated and placed with a swab kit. The patient or caregiver obtains the swab kit from an easy-access point (C) and uses the midturbinate nasal flocked swab to obtain a sample following written instructions (D). The swab is then delivered to the clinical microbiology laboratory for polymerase chain reaction assay (E), along with a precompleted prescription. If the swab is positive for influenza, the prescription is sent to the patient's pharmacy. The patient receives the test result by an automated phone system (F), along with information to pick up the prescription if the test is positive (G).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harper S.A., Fukuda K., Uyeki T.M., Cox N.J., Bridges C.B. Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-8):1–40. - PubMed
    1. Aoki F.Y., Boivin G. Influenza virus shedding: excretion patterns and effects of antiviral treatment. J Clin Virol. 2009;44(4):255–261. - PubMed
    1. Poland G.A., Tosh P., Jacobson R.M. Requiring influenza vaccination for health care workers: seven truths we must accept. Vaccine. 2005;23(17-18):2251–2255. - PubMed
    1. Weingarten S., Riedinger M., Bolton L.B., Miles P., Ault M. Barriers to influenza vaccine acceptance: a survey of physicians and nurses. Am J Infect Control. 1989;17(4):202–207. - PubMed
    1. Bridges C.B., Kuehnert M.J., Hall C.B. Transmission of influenza: implications for control in health care settings. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(8):1094–1101. - PubMed

Publication types