Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jun;95(6):1305-14.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.031153. Epub 2012 May 2.

Limiting variety in non-nutrient-dense, energy-dense foods during a lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial

Hollie A Raynor  1 , Elizabeth A Steeves, Jacki Hecht, Joseph L Fava, Rena R Wing
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Limiting variety in non-nutrient-dense, energy-dense foods during a lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial

Hollie A Raynor et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Dietary variety is a factor that influences consumption but has received little attention in obesity treatment.

Objective: This study examined the effect of limiting the variety of different non-nutrient-dense, energy-dense foods (NND-EDFs) (i.e., chips, ice cream, cookies) on dietary intake and weight loss during an 18-mo lifestyle intervention.

Design: Two hundred two adults aged 51.3 ± 9.5 y with a BMI (in kg/m2) of 34.9 ± 4.3 (57.8% women, 92.2% white) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 interventions: Lifestyle (1200-1500 kcal/d, ≤30% of energy as fat; n = 101) or Lifestyle + limited variety (LV) (limit variety of NND-EDFs, i.e., 2 choices; n = 101). Both interventions involved 48 group sessions. Dietary intake, NND-EDF hedonics, NND-EDF variety in the home, and weight were assessed at 0, 6, 12, and 18 mo.

Results: Intent-to-treat analyses showed that the Lifestyle+LV group consumed less variety (P < 0.01) and energy daily (P < 0.05) from NND-EDFs than did the Lifestyle group at 6, 12, and 18 mo. The Lifestyle+LV group consumed less total energy daily (P < 0.05) at 6 mo than did the Lifestyle group. The Lifestyle+LV group reported less (P < 0.05) NND-EDF variety in the home at 6 and 18 mo than did the Lifestyle group. The hedonics of one chosen NND-EDF decreased more (P < 0.05) in the Lifestyle+LV group. Despite these effects, no difference in percentage weight loss occurred at 18 mo (Lifestyle+LV: -9.9 ± 7.6%; Lifestyle: -9.6 ± 9.2%).

Conclusions: Limitations in dietary variety decreased intakes in the targeted area but did not affect weight loss. Limiting variety in more areas may be needed to improve weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01096719.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Participant flow.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Mean (±SD) number of different non-nutrient-dense, energy-dense foods consumed, assessed by 24-h dietary recall (A) and during the previous 28 d (B) at 0, 6, 12, and 18 mo by intervention. In a mixed-factor ANOVA, significant (P < 0.01) interactions occurred with both methods of assessment; the Lifestyle+LV group (n = 101) consumed significantly fewer different foods than did the Lifestyle group (n = 101) at each time point (***P < 0.001 and **P < 0.01). LV, limited variety.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Mean (±SD) daily energy consumption from non-nutrient-dense, energy-dense foods at 0, 6, 12, and 18 mo by intervention. In a mixed-factor ANOVA, a significant (P < 0.05) interaction occurred; the Lifestyle+LV group (n = 101) consumed significantly less energy than did the Lifestyle group (n = 101) at each time point (**P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05). LV, limited variety.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Mean (±SD) percentage weight loss at 6, 12, and 18 mo by intervention. In a mixed-factor ANOVA, a significant main effect of time occurred; percentage weight loss was significantly (**P < 0.01) greater at 6 and 12 mo than at 18 mo (Lifestyle+LV: n = 101; Lifestyle: n = 101). LV, limited variety.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 2006;295:1549–55 - PubMed
    1. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Walker M. Overweight and obesity and weight change in middle aged men: impact on cardiovascular disease and diabetes. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:134–9 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, Eberhardt MS, Goldstein DE, Little RR, Hsiao-Mei W, Byrd-Holt DD. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Diabetes Care 1998;21:518–24 - PubMed
    1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res 1998;6:51S–209S - PubMed
    1. Anderson JW, Konz EC. Obesity and disease management: effect of weight loss on comorbid conditions. Obes Res 2001;9:326S–34S - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data