Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 22552194
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Surgical resection is regarded as the only curative option for resectable oesophageal cancer, but pulmonary complications occurring in more than half of patients after open oesophagectomy are a great concern. We assessed whether minimally invasive oesophagectomy reduces morbidity compared with open oesophagectomy.
Methods: We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at five study centres in three countries between June 1, 2009, and March 31, 2011. Patients aged 18-75 years with resectable cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive either open transthoracic or minimally invasive transthoracic oesophagectomy. Randomisation was stratified by centre. Patients, and investigators undertaking interventions, assessing outcomes, and analysing data, were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was pulmonary infection within the first 2 weeks after surgery and during the whole stay in hospital. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR TC 2452.
Findings: We randomly assigned 56 patients to the open oesophagectomy group and 59 to the minimally invasive oesophagectomy group. 16 (29%) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in the first 2 weeks compared with five (9%) in the minimally invasive group (relative risk [RR] 0·30, 95% CI 0·12-0·76; p=0·005). 19 (34%) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in-hospital compared with seven (12%) in the minimally invasive group (0·35, 0·16-0·78; p=0·005). For in-hospital mortality, one patient in the open oesophagectomy group died from anastomotic leakage and two in the minimally invasive group from aspiration and mediastinitis after anastomotic leakage.
Interpretation: These findings provide evidence for the short-term benefits of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer.
Funding: Digestive Surgery Foundation of the Unit of Digestive Surgery of the VU University Medical Centre.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Is minimally invasive preferable to open oesophagectomy?Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1856-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60601-1. Epub 2012 May 1. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22552193 No abstract available.
-
Gastrointestinal cancer: Less is more for surgical treatment of oesophageal cancer.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012 May 15;9(7):369. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.89. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22585003 No abstract available.
-
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):883; author reply 885-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61496-2. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22959377 No abstract available.
-
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):883; author reply 885-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61497-4. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22959378 No abstract available.
-
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):884; author reply 885-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61499-8. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22959379 No abstract available.
-
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):884; author reply 885-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61498-6. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22959380 No abstract available.
-
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):885; author reply 885-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61500-1. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22959381 No abstract available.
-
Minimal or maximal surgery for esophageal cancer?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):633-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.118. Epub 2015 Oct 9. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 26541830 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical