Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;85(1017):e766-9.
doi: 10.1259/bjr/33344438. Epub 2012 May 2.

MRI enterography: what is the clinical impact of unsuspected extra-enteric findings?

Affiliations

MRI enterography: what is the clinical impact of unsuspected extra-enteric findings?

A Radhamma et al. Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

To define the incidence and nature of incidental extra-enteric findings on magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) following the introduction of a new clinical service, to assess the volume of additional tests generated and to gauge the potential of MRE to reduce the need for subsequent abdominal imaging. The imaging and patient records of 500 consecutive patients undergoing MRE at a single institution were reviewed. Note was made of patient demographics, any extra-enteric findings reported on the MRE, whether additional tests were recommended by the reporting radiologists to clarify or follow up extra-enteric findings and whether the patients underwent additional abdominal or pelvic imaging in the 4 months after the MRE. 64% of the cohort was male. The mean age was 45 years (range 11-80 years). Overall 190 (38%) underwent MRE for assessment of known Crohn's disease and 310 (62%) for other indications, such as abdominal pain and anaemia. 26 non-bowel-related extra-enteric abnormalities were noted on the MRE report in just 15 patients (3%), and a total of 6 additional tests were recommended by the reporting radiologist. 13 patients (2.6%) underwent some form of abdominal imaging within 4 months of the MRE. None of these additional investigations revealed any abnormality missed on the MRE. Extra-enteric findings are unlikely to have a significant impact on healthcare resources after the introduction of an MRE service.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hafeez R, Greenhalgh R, Rajan J, Bloom S, McCartney S, Halligan S, et al. Use of small bowel imaging for the diagnosis and staging of Crohn's disease—a survey of current UK practice. Br J Radiol 2011;84:508–17 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J, Beaugerie L, Karagiannis J, Allez M. The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 2010;4:7–27 - PubMed
    1. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, Maccarty RL, Welch TJ, Vanness DJ, et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2003;124:911–16 - PubMed
    1. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Meiners RJ, Wyatt KS, Hanson ME, Barlow DS, et al. Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10 286 asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2010;255:83–8 - PubMed
    1. Tolan DJ, Armstrong EM, Chapman AH. Replacing barium enema with CT colonography in patients older than 70 years: the importance of detecting extracolonic abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:1104–11 - PubMed

Publication types