Association between physician quality improvement incentives and ambulatory quality measures
- PMID: 22554038
- PMCID: PMC3537503
Association between physician quality improvement incentives and ambulatory quality measures
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of physician incentives for quality and to test the hypothesis that the quality of ambulatory medical care is better when provided by physicians with these incentives.
Study design: Cross-sectional study using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
Methods: We examined the association between 12 measures of high-quality ambulatory care and physician compensation based on quality, physician compensation based on satisfaction, and public reporting of quality measures.
Results: Overall, 20.8% of visits were to physicians whose compensation was partially based on quality, 17.7% of visits were to physicians whose compensation was partially based on patient satisfaction, and 10.0% of visits were to physicians who publicly reported quality measures. Quality of ambulatory care varied: weight reduction counseling occurred in 12.0% of preventive care visits by obese patients, whereas no urinalysis in patients with no indication was achieved in 93.0% of preventive care visits. In multivariable analyses, there were no statistically significant associations between compensation for quality and delivery of any of the 12 measures, nor between compensation for satisfaction and 11 of the 12 measures; the exception was body mass index screening in preventive visits (47.8% vs 56.2%, adjusted P = .004). There was also no statistically significant association between public reporting and delivery of 11 of 12 measures; the exception was weight reduction counseling for overweight patients (10.0% vs 25.5%, adjusted P = .01).
Conclusions: We found no consistent association between incentives for quality and 12 measures of high-quality ambulatory care.
Similar articles
-
Association of Primary Care Physician Compensation Incentives and Quality of Care in the United States, 2012-2016.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06617-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 33852143 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of physician economic incentives on admission rates of patients with ambulatory sensitive conditions: an analysis comparing two managed care structures and indemnity insurance.Am J Manag Care. 1997 Jan;3(1):49-56. Am J Manag Care. 1997. PMID: 10169249
-
Physician incentives and disclosure of payment methods to patients.J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Mar;16(3):181-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.04139.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11318914 Free PMC article.
-
[Quality improvement in primary care. Financial incentives related to quality indicators in Europe].Orv Hetil. 2013 Jul 14;154(28):1096-101. doi: 10.1556/OH.2013.29631. Orv Hetil. 2013. PMID: 23835354 Review. Hungarian.
-
Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1997.Vital Health Stat 13. 1999 Nov;(143):i-iv, 1-39. Vital Health Stat 13. 1999. PMID: 10633576 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanisms and impact of public reporting on physicians and hospitals' performance: A systematic review (2000-2020).PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247297. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33626055 Free PMC article.
-
Standard compared with mnemonic counseling for fecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1063-1070. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000755. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25932833 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Association of Primary Care Physician Compensation Incentives and Quality of Care in the United States, 2012-2016.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06617-8. Epub 2021 Apr 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 33852143 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians’ lack of awareness of how they are paid: implications for new models of reimbursement.JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14;173(18):1745-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9270. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23939243 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Does the Regulatory Environment Affect Nurse Practitioners' Patterns of Practice or Quality of Care in Health Centers?Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):437-458. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12643. Health Serv Res. 2017. PMID: 28127773 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the Twenty-first Century. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001.
-
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–2645. - PubMed
-
- Landon BE, Rosenthal MB, Normand SL, Frank RG, Epstein AM. Quality monitoring and management in commercial health plans. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(6):377–386. - PubMed
-
- Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand SL, Frank RG, Ahmad TS, Epstein AM. Employers' use of value-based purchasing strategies. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2281–2288. - PubMed
-
- Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Howitt K, Song HR, Epstein AM. Climbing up the pay-for-performance learning curve: where are the early adopters now? Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26(6):1674–1682. - PubMed