Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 22554747
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.016
Microdamage of the cortical bone during mini-implant insertion with self-drilling and self-tapping techniques: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this research was to evaluate microdamage accumulation after mini-implant placement by self-drilling (without a pilot hole) and self-tapping (screwed into a pilot hole) insertion techniques. The null hypothesis was that the mini-implant insertion technique would have no influence on microcrack accumulation and propagation in the cortical bones of the maxillae and mandibles of adult hounds.
Methods: Mini-implants (n = 162; diameter, 1.6 mm; length, 6 mm) were placed in the maxillae and mandibles of 9 hounds (12-14 months old) with self-drilling and self-tapping insertion techniques. The techniques were randomly assigned to the left or the right side of each jaw. Each hound received 18 mini-implants (10 in the mandible, 8 in the maxilla). Histomorphometric parameters including total crack length and crack surface density were measured. The null hypothesis was rejected in favor of an alternate hypothesis: that the self-drilling technique results in more microdamage (microcracks) accumulation in the adjacent cortical bone in both the maxilla and the mandible immediately after mini-implant placement. A cluster level analysis was used to analyze the data on the outcome measured. Since the measurements were clustered within dogs, a paired-samples t test was used to analyze the average differences between insertion methods at both jaw locations. A significance level of 0.05 was used for both analyses.
Results: The self-drilling technique resulted in greater total crack lengths in both the maxilla and the mandible (maxilla: mean difference, 18.70 ± 7.04 μm/mm(2); CI, 13.29-24.11; mandible: mean difference, 22.98 ± 6.43 μm/mm(2); CI, 18.04-27.93; P <0.05), higher crack surface density in both the maxilla and the mandible (maxilla: mean difference, 10.39 ± 9.16 μm/mm(2); CI, 3.34-17.43; mandible: mean difference, 11.28 ± 3.41 μm/mm(2); CI, 8.65-13.90; P <0.05).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated greater microdamage in the cortical bones of adult hounds in both the maxilla and the mandible by the self-drilling insertion technique compared with the self-tapping technique.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Orthodontic mini-implant diameter does not affect in-situ linear microcrack generation in the mandible or the maxilla.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Dec;142(6):768-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.014. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012. PMID: 23195362
-
Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jan;133(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.023. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. PMID: 18174070
-
Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Jun;131(6):704.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.040. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17561041
-
Implant-related nerve injuries.Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Apr;59(2):357-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Dec 15. Dent Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 25835799 Review.
-
[Planning of orthodontic treatment in patients with maxillary dentition defects using mathematical methods].Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2002;81(5):53-7. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2002. PMID: 12532890 Review. Russian.
Cited by
-
Influence of late removal after treatment on the removal torque of microimplants.Korean J Orthod. 2022 May 25;52(3):201-209. doi: 10.4041/kjod21.217. Korean J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 35418519 Free PMC article.
-
Can maxilla and mandible bone quality explain differences in orthodontic mini-implant failures?Biomater Investig Dent. 2021 Jan 8;8(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2020.1863155. Biomater Investig Dent. 2021. PMID: 33521649 Free PMC article.
-
Repair of microdamage in osteonal cortical bone adjacent to bone screw.PLoS One. 2014 Feb 20;9(2):e89343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089343. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24586702 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of cortical bone microdamage following insertion of microimplants using optical coherence tomography: a preliminary study.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2018 Nov.;19(11):818-828. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1700612. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2018. PMID: 30387332 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical characteristics and reinsertion guidelines for retrieved orthodontic miniscrews.Angle Orthod. 2014 Sep;84(5):878-84. doi: 10.2319/092613-703.1. Epub 2014 Mar 3. Angle Orthod. 2014. PMID: 24575952 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources