Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Dec;41(8):637-44.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr/21152480. Epub 2012 May 3.

Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs

R Patcas  1 , G Markic, L Müller, O Ullrich, T Peltomäki, C J Kellenberger, C A Karlo
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Accuracy of linear intraoral measurements using cone beam CT and multidetector CT: a tale of two CTs

R Patcas et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(2):20120410

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to compare the accuracy of linear bone measurements of cone beam CT (CBCT) with multidetector CT (MDCT) and validate intraoral soft-tissue measurements in CBCT.

Methods: Comparable views of CBCT and MDCT were obtained from eight intact cadaveric heads. The anatomical positions of the gingival margin and the buccal alveolar bone ridge were determined. Image measurements (CBCT/MDCT) were performed upon multiplanar reformatted data sets and compared with the anatomical measurements; the number of non-assessable sites (NASs) was evaluated.

Results: Radiological measurements were accurate with a mean difference from anatomical measurements of 0.14 mm (CBCT) and 0.23 mm (MDCT). These differences were statistically not significant, but the limits of agreement for bone measurements were broader in MDCT (-1.35 mm; 1.82 mm) than in CBCT (-0.93 mm; 1.21 mm). The limits of agreement for soft-tissue measurements in CBCT were smaller (-0.77 mm; 1.07 mm), indicating a slightly higher accuracy. More NASs occurred in MDCT (14.5%) than in CBCT (8.3%).

Conclusions: CBCT is slightly more reliable for linear measurements than MDCT and less affected by metal artefacts. CBCT accuracy of linear intraoral soft-tissue measurements is similar to the accuracy of bone measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Measurements taken. IE, incisal edge; GM, gingival margin; ABR, alveolar bone ridge. (b) Representative multidetector CT scan, specimen 949
Figure 2
Figure 2
Orientation of the multiplanar image reformations perpendicular to the dentition, enabling one to view every assessed tooth in its buccolingual profile
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box and whisker plot of the differences (Diff) between the radiological (Rx) and anatomical (Anat) measurements. CBCT, cone beam CT; MDCT, multidetector CT
Figure 4
Figure 4
Bland–Altman plots for (a) multidetector CT (bone), (b) cone beam CT (CBCT) (bone) and (c) CBCT (soft tissue). Mean value (solid thick middle line), limits of agreement (broken lines) and 95% confidence intervals of the limits of agreement (solid thin lines) are shown. Anat, anatomical; Diff, difference; SD, standard deviation
Figure 5
Figure 5
Representative scan of the identical specimen (same region and same multiplanar reformatting) with typically constrained data from metal reconstruction. (a) Multidetector CT, (b) cone beam CT. Note the obvious difference in image quality
Figure 6
Figure 6
Lip retractor commonly used in orthodontics. This tool might be useful in cone beam CT image acquisition for gingival measurements
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Robb RA, Sinak LJ, Hoffman EA, Kinsey JH, Harris LD, Ritman EL. Dynamic volume imaging of moving organs. J Med Syst 1982;6:539–554 - PubMed
    1. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:245–248 - PubMed
    1. Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:371–377 - PubMed
    1. Ludlow J, Davies-Ludlow L, Brooks S. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229–234 - PubMed
    1. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:83–86 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms