Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(4):e35564.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035564. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

Empirical power and sample size calculations for cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized crossover studies

Affiliations

Empirical power and sample size calculations for cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized crossover studies

Nicholas G Reich et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

In recent years, the number of studies using a cluster-randomized design has grown dramatically. In addition, the cluster-randomized crossover design has been touted as a methodological advance that can increase efficiency of cluster-randomized studies in certain situations. While the cluster-randomized crossover trial has become a popular tool, standards of design, analysis, reporting and implementation have not been established for this emergent design. We address one particular aspect of cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized crossover trial design: estimating statistical power. We present a general framework for estimating power via simulation in cluster-randomized studies with or without one or more crossover periods. We have implemented this framework in the clusterPower software package for R, freely available online from the Comprehensive R Archive Network. Our simulation framework is easy to implement and users may customize the methods used for data analysis. We give four examples of using the software in practice. The clusterPower package could play an important role in the design of future cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized crossover studies. This work is the first to establish a universal method for calculating power for both cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized clinical trials. More research is needed to develop standardized and recommended methodology for cluster-randomized crossover studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01249625.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: This study was partly funded by Sage Products, Inc. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Power curves from Examples A and B.
These curves show the relationship of power with the number of clusters. The points show simulated power for 1000 datasets with a smoothed line drawn through the data to highlight the overall pattern. The solid line and gray points represent the simulations with constant baseline rates (Example A) and the open circles and dashed line represent the simulations with time-varying baseline rates (Example B).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Power curves from Example C.
These curves depict the relationship between power and sample size per cluster across different effect sizes. The points show simulated power for 500 datasets.

References

    1. Platt R, Takvorian S, Septimus E, Hickok J, Moody J, et al. Cluster randomized trials in comparative effectiveness research: randomizing hospitals to test methods for prevention of healthcare-associated infections. Medical Care. 2010;48:S52. - PubMed
    1. Ukoumunne O, Gulliford M, Chinn S, Sterne J, Burney P. Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 3: 1999;iii - PubMed
    1. Hayes R, Bennett S. Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. International journal of epidemiology. 1999;28:319. - PubMed
    1. Rietbergen C, Moerbeek M. The design of cluster randomized crossover trials. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2011;36:472–490.
    1. Turner R, White I, Croudace T. Analysis of cluster randomized cross-over trial data: a comparison of methods. Statistics in medicine. 2007;26:274–289. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data