Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jun 1;32(6):373-85.
doi: 10.2165/11631890-000000000-00000.

Early non-response in patients with severe depression: escitalopram up-titration versus switch to duloxetine

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Early non-response in patients with severe depression: escitalopram up-titration versus switch to duloxetine

Anjana Bose et al. Clin Drug Investig. .

Abstract

Background: Comparative evidence for second-step treatment strategies in severe depression is scarce. Up-titrating a well tolerated selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) versus switching to a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) after initial SSRI non-response are possible treatment options. It is often unclear whether relevant tolerability and efficacy differences exist between SSRI up-titration versus switch to an SNRI.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of escitalopram versus switch to duloxetine in patients who failed to respond to escitalopram 10 mg/day.

Methods: This was an active-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized study in a general community comparing escitalopram and duloxetine in patients with severe depression; patients who did not respond (<50% Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] improvement) to 2 weeks of single-blind escitalopram 10 mg/day during the lead-in period were randomized to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment. 571 male and female outpatients aged 18-65 years with severe depression (MADRS total score ≥30) participated in the study and received at least one dose of escitalopram 10 mg/day in the single-blind lead-in phase. During the double-blind randomized phase, 474 patients who did not respond to lead-in escitalopram were randomized and received treatment with escitalopram 20 mg (n = 229) or duloxetine 60 mg (n = 245). Treatment was single-blind escitalopram 10 mg/day during a 2-week lead-in followed by 8-week double-blind escitalopram 20 mg/day or duloxetine 60 mg/day. The main outcome measure was time to all-cause premature study discontinuation.

Results: There was no difference in time to all-cause discontinuation between groups (hazard ratio escitalopram/duloxetine = 0.95 [95% CI 0.64, 1.41]; p = 0.727). Treatment with escitalopram compared with duloxetine resulted in significant improvement in MADRS total score at the end of week 8 (least squares mean difference [LSMD] = -1.87 [95% CI -3.60, -0.14]; p = 0.034) using last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis. Significantly more escitalopram (54%) than duloxetine (42%) patients achieved remission (MADRS ≤10) by week 8 (p = 0.013). Adverse events were similar between the two treatment groups.

Conclusion: In initial non-responders to escitalopram 10 mg/day, dose escalation to 20 mg/day provided better efficacy than switching to duloxetine 60 mg/day, while discontinuations for any reasons and adverse events were similar.

Clinical trial registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00384436.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57 - PubMed
    1. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun;23(6):1303-18 - PubMed
    1. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006 Mar;31(2):122-31 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;63(4):331-6 - PubMed
    1. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 Jul;9(7):975-84 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data