[Content validity index in scale development]
- PMID: 22561427
- DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007
[Content validity index in scale development]
Abstract
Content validity is the degree to which an instrument has an appropriate sample of items for the construct being measured and is an important procedure in scale development. Content validity index (CVI) is the most widely used index in quantitative evaluation. There are 2 kinds of CVI: I-CVI and S-CVI. A method to compute a modified kappa statistic (K*) can be used to adjust I-CVI for chance agreement. S-CVI/UA and S-CVI/Ave are both scale level CVI with different formulas. Researchers recommend that a scale with excellent content validity should be composed of I-CVIs of 0.78 or higher and S-CVI/UA and S-CVI/Ave of 0.8 and 0.9 or higher, respectively. The characteristics and qualifications of the experts, process and main results of content validity evaluation should be reported in scale-related manuscript.
Similar articles
-
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199. Res Nurs Health. 2007. PMID: 17654487 Review.
-
Content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-Acute Coronary Syndrome Version.Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Spring;24(2):11-8. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014. PMID: 24915664
-
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147. Res Nurs Health. 2006. PMID: 16977646
-
Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel.Nurs Res. 2007 Sep-Oct;56(5):361-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289505.30037.91. Nurs Res. 2007. PMID: 17846558
-
Design and content validation of an instrument measuring user perception of the persuasive design principles in a breastfeeding mHealth app: A modified Delphi study.Int J Med Inform. 2022 Aug;164:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104789. Epub 2022 May 10. Int J Med Inform. 2022. PMID: 35597101 Review.
Cited by
-
The Persian Version of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire's Short Form (FOPQ-SF): Psychometric Features Among Cancer Patients.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Oct 26;56(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01115-6. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39460823
-
Postoperative rehabilitation and quality of life evaluation for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 26;14(1):14747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65589-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38926508 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the dry eye-related quality-of-life score questionnaire.Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 18;17(9):1614-1620. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.09.06. eCollection 2024. Int J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39296558 Free PMC article.
-
Translation, Adaptation, and Psychometric Testing of the Almere Technology Acceptance Questionnaire (ATAQ) Among Older Adults in China.Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Sep 12;17:1353-1364. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S367781. eCollection 2022. Clin Interv Aging. 2022. PMID: 36117570 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond digital interfaces: The human element in online teaching and its influence on student experiences.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0307262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307262. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39083489 Free PMC article.