Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Apr 28;18(16):1953-8.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1953.

Transparent-cap-fitted colonoscopy shows higher performance with cecal intubation time in difficult cases

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Transparent-cap-fitted colonoscopy shows higher performance with cecal intubation time in difficult cases

Hyung Hun Kim et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of cap-fitted colonoscopy (CFC) with regard to cecal intubation time.

Methods: Two hundred and ninety-five patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial between January and December 2010. Colonoscopies were conducted by a single endoscopist. Patient characteristics including age, sex, body mass index, history of abdominal surgery, quality of preparation, and the presence of diverticulosis were recorded.

Results: One hundred and fifty patients were allocated into a CFC group and 145 into a non-CFC (NCF) group. Cecal intubations were achieved in all patients. Cecal intubation time in the CFC group was significantly shorter than in the NCF group for specific conditions: age ≥ 60 years, prior abdominal surgery, and poor bowel preparation. The number of detected adenomas was higher in the CFC group than in the NCF group (P = 0.040).

Conclusion: CFC facilitated shortening of the cecal intubation time in difficult cases, and was more sensitive for detecting adenomas than was NCF.

Keywords: Cap-fitted colonoscopy; Cecal intubation; Colonoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Advantage of cap-fitted colonoscopy for preventing red-out. A: Although the precise direction could not be judged, colonoscopy showed a slight fold (white arrows) without red-out; B: A subtle movement showed a dark area at the 11 o’clock position (white arrow); C: Following the dark are at the 11 o’clock position enabled the colonoscopist to find the direction of insertion (black arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Advantage of cap-fitted colonoscopy for observing lateral side. A: The colonoscopist easily noticed the route of insertion because the transparent cap showed the small dark lumen at the 1 o’clock position through its lateral wall (black arrows); B: Following the route shown through the lateral wall of the transparent cap, a wide lumen was found easily.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The opposite, blind side of the folds could be observed with fewer problems during colonoscopy. A: Compressing the tip of a fold straightened the entire fold and improved the view; B: Bending the tip of the endoscope allowed a front view of the lesion at the blind side of the fold.

References

    1. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:162–168. - PubMed
    1. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:169–174. - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Sonnenberg A. Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:868–877. - PubMed
    1. Byeon JS, Yang SK, Kim TI, Kim WH, Lau JY, Leung WK, Fujita R, Makharia GK, Abdullah M, Hilmi I, et al. Colorectal neoplasm in asymptomatic Asians: a prospective multinational multicenter colonoscopy survey. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:1015–1022. - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, Kirk LM, Litlin S, Lieberman DA, Waye JD, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1296–1308. - PubMed

Publication types