The fracture strength of ceramic brackets: a comparative study
- PMID: 2256564
- DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1990)060<0269:TFSOCB>2.0.CO;2
The fracture strength of ceramic brackets: a comparative study
Abstract
Recent demand for esthetic brackets has led to the development and use of ceramic brackets in orthodontics. The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture strength of different ceramic brackets under different surface conditions and ligation methods using a torsional wire bending force. Five different bracket types (two polycrystalline, two single-crystal, and one metal) were tested using elastic and wire ligation, with half being scratched and the other half remaining unscratched. Results showed a significant difference between bracket types and surface conditions. Non-scratched single-crystal brackets had higher fracture strengths and slightly higher fracture loads than polycrystalline brackets. However, single-crystal brackets were significantly adversely affected by surface damage (scratching), while polycrystalline brackets were not significantly affected by surface damage. The fracture behavior of ceramic brackets followed the Griffith model where fracture strength decreased following surface damage.
Similar articles
-
Bond strength of ceramic brackets with various bonding systems.Angle Orthod. 1991 Spring;61(1):35-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0035:BSOCBW>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1991. PMID: 2012320
-
Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to resin-composite surfaces.Aust Orthod J. 1997 Oct;15(1):10-5. Aust Orthod J. 1997. PMID: 9528397
-
Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.Aust Orthod J. 2010 Nov;26(2):134-40. Aust Orthod J. 2010. PMID: 21175022
-
Aesthetic orthodontic brackets.J Orthod. 2005 Jun;32(2):146-63. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021024. J Orthod. 2005. PMID: 15994990 Review.
-
[Physicomechanical characteristics of alloys used for preparing metal ceramic dentures].Stomatologiia (Mosk). 1985 Jul-Aug;64(4):75-8. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 1985. PMID: 3901415 Review. Russian. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Torque expression capacity of 0.018 and 0.022 bracket slots by changing archwire material and cross section.Prog Orthod. 2014 Sep 25;15(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0053-x. Prog Orthod. 2014. PMID: 25329505 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of cigarette smoke on aesthetic brackets: an in vitro study.Dental Press J Orthod. 2022 Sep 5;27(4):e2220365. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e2220365.oar. eCollection 2022. Dental Press J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 36074431 Free PMC article.
-
Does the CO2 laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):55-60. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.2.055-060.oar. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28658356 Free PMC article.
-
Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists.J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Jul 1;12(7):e656-e662. doi: 10.4317/jced.56976. eCollection 2020 Jul. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020. PMID: 32904974 Free PMC article.
-
Testing the tensile fracture strength tie-wings of different orthodontic ceramic bracket using an Instron machine.Saudi Dent J. 2023 Dec;35(8):1048-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.10.020. Epub 2023 Nov 2. Saudi Dent J. 2023. PMID: 38107037 Free PMC article.