Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 22;109(21):8026-31.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120666109. Epub 2012 May 7.

The genetic architecture of economic and political preferences

Affiliations

The genetic architecture of economic and political preferences

Daniel J Benjamin et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Preferences are fundamental building blocks in all models of economic and political behavior. We study a new sample of comprehensively genotyped subjects with data on economic and political preferences and educational attainment. We use dense single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data to estimate the proportion of variation in these traits explained by common SNPs and to conduct genome-wide association study (GWAS) and prediction analyses. The pattern of results is consistent with findings for other complex traits. First, the estimated fraction of phenotypic variation that could, in principle, be explained by dense SNP arrays is around one-half of the narrow heritability estimated using twin and family samples. The molecular-genetic-based heritability estimates, therefore, partially corroborate evidence of significant heritability from behavior genetic studies. Second, our analyses suggest that these traits have a polygenic architecture, with the heritable variation explained by many genes with small effects. Our results suggest that most published genetic association studies with economic and political traits are dramatically underpowered, which implies a high false discovery rate. These results convey a cautionary message for whether, how, and how soon molecular genetic data can contribute to, and potentially transform, research in social science. We propose some constructive responses to the inferential challenges posed by the small explanatory power of individual SNPs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Benjamin DJ, et al. The promises and pitfalls of genoeconomics. Annu Rev Econom. 2012 in press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp JP, et al. Molecular genetics and economics. J Econ Perspect. 2011;25:57–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamin DJ, et al. Genoeconomics. In: Weinstein M, Vaupel JW, Wachter KW, editors. Biosocial Surveys. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2007. pp. 304–335. - PubMed
    1. Jencks C. Heredity, environment, and public policy reconsidered. Am Sociol Rev. 1980;45:723–736. - PubMed
    1. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:1–22. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources