Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan-Dec;1(1):66-74.
doi: 10.1159/000329835. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

A randomized controlled trial on very early speech and language therapy in acute stroke patients with aphasia

Affiliations

A randomized controlled trial on very early speech and language therapy in acute stroke patients with aphasia

A C Laska et al. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2011 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Aphasia affects one third of acute stroke patients. There is a considerable spontaneous recovery in aphasia, but impaired communication ability remains a great problem. Communication difficulties are an impediment to rehabilitation. Early treatment of the language deficits leading to increased communication ability would improve rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to elucidate the efficacy of very early speech and language therapy (SLT) in acute stroke patients with aphasia.

Methods: A prospective, open, randomized, controlled trial was carried out with blinded endpoint evaluation of SLT, starting within 2 days of stroke onset and lasting for 21 days. 123 consecutive patients with acute, first-ever ischemic stroke and aphasia were randomized. The SLT treatment was Language Enrichment Therapy, and the aphasia tests used were the Norsk grunntest for afasi (NGA) and the Amsterdam-Nijmegen everyday language test (ANELT), both performed by speech pathologists, blinded for randomization.

Results: The primary outcome, as measured by ANELT at day 21, was 1.3 in the actively treated patient group and 1.2 among controls. NGA led to similar results in both groups. Patients with a higher level of education (>12 years) improved more on ANELT by day 21 than those with <12 years of education (3.4 vs. 1.0, respectively). In 34 patients in the treatment group and 19 in the control group improvement was ≥1 on ANELT (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the degree of aphasia at baseline except for fluency, which was higher in the group responding to treatment.

Conclusions: Very early intensive SLT with the Language Enrichment Therapy program over 21 days had no effect on the degree of aphasia in unselected acute aphasic stroke patients. In aphasic patients with more fluency, SLT resulted in a significant improvement as compared to controls. A higher educational level of >12 years was beneficial.

Keywords: Acute stroke; Aphasia; Language Enrichment Therapy; Speech and language therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for randomized patients.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Types of aphasia at baseline. Mixed non = Mixed non-fluent, Trans mot = transcortical motor, Mixed flu = mixed fluent, Trans sens = transcortical sensory.

References

    1. Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med. 2001;249:413–422. - PubMed
    1. Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke. 2006;37:1379–1384. - PubMed
    1. Bejot Y, Rouaud O, Jacquin A, Osseby GV, Durier J, Manckoundia P, Pfitzenmeyer P, Moreau T, Giroud M. Stroke in the very old: incidence, risk factors, clinical features, outcomes and access to resources – a 22-year population-based study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29:111–121. - PubMed
    1. Basso A. Prognostic factors in aphasia. Aphasiology. 1992;6:337–348.
    1. Cicerone K, Dahlberg C, Malec J, Langenbahn D, Felicetti T, Kneipp S, Ellmo W, Kalmar K, Giacino J, Harley P, Laatsch L, Morse P, Catanese J. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1681–1692. - PubMed