Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:415430.
doi: 10.1155/2012/415430. Epub 2012 Apr 5.

Glove technique in single-port access laparoscopic surgery: results of an initial experience

Affiliations

Glove technique in single-port access laparoscopic surgery: results of an initial experience

Lorenzo Livraghi et al. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012.

Abstract

Introduction. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a virtually "scarless" technique. A retrospective analysis is performed to evaluate an initial experience of this surgical approach. Materials and Methods. From January 2010 to October 2011, SILS was considered as a minimally invasive approach to abdominal disease. The access was made by a standard wound protector and a size 6 glove. A series of little accesses were made on the tips of the glove-fingers to induce pneumoperitoneum and to create a working channel for the laparoscopic instruments. An analysis of costs of this technique was made too. Results. SILS was successfully completed with low cost in 34 patients: 20 appendectomy, 12 cholecystectomy, and 2 right colectomy were performed with a median operative time of 35, 45, and 67.5 minutes, respectively. In no patient any conversion to standard laparoscopy or to open surgery was needed. The postoperative course was uneventful in all patients. In right hemicolectomy, the oncological parameters were respected. Conclusions. In this paper the glove-port technique showed multiple advantages. The SILS is a feasible approach for some pathologies in selected patients. The glove-port is a simple, low-cost, reproducible, and sure method to perform SILS in a high-experienced laparoscopic surgical centre.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Placement of wound protector.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Placement of surgical glove.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Induction of pneumoperitoneum.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Placement of instruments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The umbilical scare at the end of a procedure.

References

    1. Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DWH, Ko CW. Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Medical Journal. 2005;11(1):30–35. - PubMed
    1. Osborne DA, Alexander G, Boe B, Zervos EE. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: past, present, and future. Surgical Technology International. 2006;15:81–85. - PubMed
    1. Tagaya N, Rokkaku K, Kubota K. Needlescopic cholecistectomy versus needlescope-assisted laparoscopic cholecistectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2007;17:375–379. - PubMed
    1. Legget PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecistectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2000;14:32–36. - PubMed
    1. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2002;16(3):458–464. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources