Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):1558-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.035. Epub 2012 May 7.

Positron emission tomography for assessing local failure after stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

Affiliations

Positron emission tomography for assessing local failure after stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

Xu Zhang et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. .

Abstract

Purpose: We analyzed whether positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography standardized uptake values (SUVs) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could predict local recurrence (LR) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods and materials: This study comprised 128 patients with Stage I (n = 68) or isolated recurrent/secondary parenchymal (n = 60) NSCLC treated with image-guided SBRT to 50 Gy over 4 consecutive days; prior radiotherapy was allowed. PET/computed tomography scans were obtained before therapy and at 1 to 6 months after therapy, as well as subsequently as clinically indicated. Continuous variables were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis tests and categorical variables with Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Actuarial local failure rates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: At a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 6-71 months), the actuarial 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control rates were 100%, 98.5%, and 98.5%, respectively, in the Stage I group and 95.8%, 87.6%, and 85.8%, respectively, in the recurrent group. The cumulative rates of regional nodal recurrence and distant metastasis were 8.8% (6 of 68) and 14.7% (10 of 68), respectively, for the Stage I group and 11.7% (7 of 60) and 16.7% (10 of 60), respectively, for the recurrent group. Univariate analysis showed that SUVs obtained 12.1 to 24 months after treatment for the Stage I group (p = 0.007) and 6.1 to 12 months and 12.1 to 24 months after treatment for the recurrent group were associated with LR (p < 0.001 for both). Of the 128 patients, 17 (13.3%) had ipsilateral consolidation after SBRT but no elevated metabolic activity on PET; none had LR. The cutoff maximum SUV of 5 was found to have 100% sensitivity, 91% specificity, a 50% positive predictive value, and a 100% negative predictive value for predicting LR.

Conclusions: PET was helpful for distinguishing SBRT-induced consolidation from LR. SUVs obtained more than 6 months after SBRT for NSCLC were associated with local failure. A maximum SUV greater than 5, especially at more than 6 months after SBRT, should prompt biopsy to rule out LR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for lesions with vs. without local recurrence (LR). (A) Distribution of median SUVmax before stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients who did or did not have LR. No difference was found between the group treated for Stage I disease (p = 0.242) and the group treated for recurrent disease (p = 0.355). The box length is the interquartile range. The circles and asterisks are the outliers. The asterisks represent extreme outliers (>3 times the interquartile range). The circles represent outliers with values between 1.5 and 3 times the interquartile range. (B) Changes in median SUVmax over time after SBRT in the group treated for recurrent disease. The solid line indicates standard uptake values (SUVs) for lesions that recurred locally; the dashed line indicates SUVs for lesions that did not. (C) Distribution of median SUVmax at 6.1 to 12 months after SBRT for Stage I disease or recurrent disease for lesions with or without LR. PET = positron emission tomography.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Stereotactic body radiotherapy plans and axial positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography scans obtained before and 6 months after treatment for a patient with a tumor that did recur (A) and for another patient with a tumor that did not recur (B).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Development of post-treatment consolidation in patients without local recurrence. (A) Median maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor size at various times after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). (B) Axial positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans and treatment plan illustrate typical post-SBRT consolidation and its resolution over time.

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. - PubMed
    1. Rami-Porta R, Ball D, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: Proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:593–602. - PubMed
    1. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Warren JL, et al. Racial differences in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1198–1205. - PubMed
    1. Onishi H, Araki T, Shirato H, et al. Stereotactic hypofractionated high-dose irradiation for stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma clinical outcome in 245 subjects in a Japanese multiinstitutional study. Cancer. 2004;101:1623–1631. - PubMed
    1. Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yiannoutsos C, et al. Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4833–4839. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances