Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;38(7):1103-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.032. Epub 2012 May 12.

Intra- and interoperator reproducibility of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography--preliminary results

Affiliations

Intra- and interoperator reproducibility of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography--preliminary results

Simona Bota et al. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Our study assessed acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) reproducibility and the factors influencing it. The intra- and interoperator reproducibility were studied in 33 and 58 patients, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess ARFI reproducibility. The overall intraoperator agreement was better than the interoperator one: ICC 0.90 vs. ICC 0.81. The correlation of repeated ARFI measurements was higher, but not significantly so, in cases in which intraoperator reproducibility was assessed compared with the ones in which interoperator reproducibility was studied: r = 0.848 vs. r = 0.694 (p = 0.08). For both intra- and interoperator reproducibility, the ICCs were smaller in women vs. men (0.88 vs. 0.91 and 0.67 vs. 0.86, respectively), in patients with high body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² vs. <25 kg/m² (0.88 vs. 0.91 and 0.79 vs. 0.82, respectively), in patients with ascites vs. no ascites (0.80 vs. 0.93 and 0.78 vs. 0.84, respectively) and in noncirrhotic vs. cirrhotic patients (0.77 vs. 0.82 and 0.70 vs. 0.83, respectively).

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources