Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 1;98(1):94-107.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.08.007. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

A Comparison of EPI Sampling, Probability Sampling, and Compact Segment Sampling Methods for Micro and Small Enterprises

Li-Wei Chao  1 , Helena Szrek, Karl Peltzer, Shandir Ramlagan, Peter Fleming, Rui Leite, Jesswill Magerman, Godfrey B Ngwenya, Nuno Sousa Pereira, Jere Behrman
Affiliations

A Comparison of EPI Sampling, Probability Sampling, and Compact Segment Sampling Methods for Micro and Small Enterprises

Li-Wei Chao et al. J Dev Econ. .

Abstract

Finding an efficient method for sampling micro- and small-enterprises (MSEs) for research and statistical reporting purposes is a challenge in developing countries, where registries of MSEs are often nonexistent or outdated. This lack of a sampling frame creates an obstacle in finding a representative sample of MSEs. This study uses computer simulations to draw samples from a census of businesses and non-businesses in the Tshwane Municipality of South Africa, using three different sampling methods: the traditional probability sampling method, the compact segment sampling method, and the World Health Organization's Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) sampling method. Three mechanisms by which the methods could differ are tested, the proximity selection of respondents, the at-home selection of respondents, and the use of inaccurate probability weights. The results highlight the importance of revisits and accurate probability weights, but the lesser effect of proximity selection on the samples' statistical properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bennett S, Radalowicz A, Vella V, Tomkins A. A computer simulation of household sampling schemes for health surveys in developing countries. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1994;23(6):1282–1291. - PubMed
    1. Brogan D, Flagg EW, Deming M, Waldman R. Increasing the accuracy of the Expanded Programme on Immunization’s cluster survey design. Annals of Epidemiology. 1994;4(4):302–311. - PubMed
    1. Chao L-W, Pauly MV, Szrek H, Sousa-Pereira N, Bundred F, Cross C, Gow J. Poor Health kills small business: illness and microenterprises in South Africa. Health Affairs. 2007;26(2):474–482. - PubMed
    1. de Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C. Returns to capital in microenterprises: evidence from a field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2008;123(4):1329–1372.
    1. de Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C. Measuring microenterprise profits: Must we ask how the sausage is made? Journal of Development Economics. 2009;88(1):19–31.

LinkOut - more resources