Cost-effectiveness modelling of sequential biologic strategies for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in Finland
- PMID: 22582103
- PMCID: PMC3349947
- DOI: 10.2174/1874312901206010038
Cost-effectiveness modelling of sequential biologic strategies for the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in Finland
Abstract
Objective: The main objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic options in moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when a clinical response to a first TNF-blocker, either etanercept (ETA), adalimumab (ADA), or infliximab (INF), is insufficient.
Methods: Effectiveness criteria were defined as remission (RS), low disease activity (LDAS), and moderate to high disease activity (MHDAS). Cost-effectiveness was derived as cost per day in RS and in LDAS using simulation modelling to assess six sequential biologic strategies over 2 years. Each sequential treatment strategy was composed of three biologic agents and included a first anti-TNF agent, ETA, ADA or INF, followed by either abatacept (ABA) or rituximab (RTX) as a second therapeutic option in case of an insufficient response, followed by another anti-TNF agent in case of further insufficient response.
Results: Over two years and taking into account biologic costs, the following estimated mean costs per day in RS and LDAS were respectively of €829 and €428 for the biologic sequence composed of ADA-ABA-ETA, €1292 and €516 for the sequence ADA-RTX-ETA, €829 and €429 for the sequence ETA-ABA-ADA, €1292 and €517 for the sequence ETARTX- ADA, €840 and €434 for the sequence INF-ABA-ETA, and €1309 and €523 for the sequence INF-RTX-ETA.
Conclusion: The treatment sequences including ABA as the second biologic option appear more cost-effective than those including RTX in a patients with moderate to severe RA and an insufficient response to a first anti-TNF agent.
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; biologics; modelling.; rheumatoid arthritis.
Figures
References
-
- Puolakka K, Kautiainen H, Pohjolainen T, Virta L. Rheumatoid arthritis remains a threat to work productivity a nationwide registerbased uncidence study from finland. Scand J Rheumatol. 2010;39:436–8. - PubMed
-
- Hyrich K, Lunt M, Watson K, Symmons D, Silman A. Register BSfRB.Outcomes after switching from one anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent to a second anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis results from a large UK national cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:13–20. - PubMed
-
- Gabriel S, Drummond M, Maetzel A. Omeract 6 economics working group report: a proposal for a reference case for economic evaluation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:887–90. - PubMed
-
- Russell A, Beresniak A, Bessette L, et al. Cost-effectiveness modeling of abatacept versus other biologic agents in dmards and anti-tnf inadequate responders for the management of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;28(4 ):403–12. - PubMed
-
- Genovese M, Schiff M, Luggen M, et al. Efficacy and safety of the selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept following 2 years of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. Ann Rheum Dis . 2008;67:547–54. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials