Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 May 14:12:116.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-116.

Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Measuring data reliability for preventive services in electronic medical records

Michelle Greiver et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Improvements in the quality of health care services are often measured using data present in medical records. Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) contain potentially valuable new sources of health data. However, data quality in EMRs may not be optimal and should be assessed. Data reliability (are the same data elements being measured over time?) is a prerequisite for data validity (are the data accurate?). Our objective was to measure the reliability of data for preventive services in primary care EMRs during the transition to EMR.

Methods: Our data sources were randomly selected eligible patients' medical records and data obtained from provincial administrative datasets. Eighteen community-based family physicians in Toronto, Ontario that implemented EMRs starting in 2006 participated in this study. We measured the proportion of patients eligible for a service (Pap smear, screening mammogram or influenza vaccination) that received the service. We compared the change in rates of selected preventive services calculated from the medical record audits with the change in administrative datasets.

Results: In the first year of EMR use (2006) services decreased by 8.7% more (95% CI -11.0%- - 6.4%, p < 0.0001) when measured through medical record audits as compared with administrative datasets. Services increased by 2.4% more (95% CI 0%-4.9%, p = 0.05) in the medical record audits during the second year of EMR use (2007).

Conclusion: There were differences between the change measured through medical record audits and administrative datasets. Problems could include difficulties with organizing new data entry processes as well as continued use of both paper and EMRs. Data extracted from EMRs had limited reliability during the initial phase of EMR implementation. Unreliable data interferes with the ability to measure and improve health care quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mammogram and Pap smear service levels derived from medical record audits and from administrative data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Influenza vaccination and fecal occult blood service levels derived from medical record audits and from administrative data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Newcomer LN. Perspective: physician, measure thyself. Health Aff. 1998;17(4):32–35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.4.32. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Romanow R. Building on values: the future of health care in Canada. National Library of Canada, Ottawa; 2002.
    1. Have paper records passed their expiry date? CMAJ. 2005;173(7):725. - PMC - PubMed
    1. CIHI CPCSSN data analysis report. cycle 2A. Canadian Institutes for Health Information, Toronto; 2010.
    1. National Physician Survey. http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/2007_Survey/2007results-e.asp.

Publication types

MeSH terms