Ordering CT pulmonary angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism: defense versus evidence in the emergency room
- PMID: 22584801
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-012-2595-z
Ordering CT pulmonary angiography to exclude pulmonary embolism: defense versus evidence in the emergency room
Abstract
Purpose: To identify reasons for ordering computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), to identify the frequency of reasons for CTPA reflecting defensive behavior and evidence-based behavior, and to identify the impact of defensive medicine and of training about diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) on positive results of CTPA.
Methods: Physicians in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital completed a questionnaire before CTPA after being trained about diagnosing PE and completing questionnaires.
Results: Nine hundred patients received a CTPA during 3 years. For 328 CTPAs performed during the 1-year study period, 140 (43 %) questionnaires were completed. The most frequent reasons for ordering a CTPA were to confirm/rule out PE (93 %), elevated D-dimers (66 %), fear of missing PE (55 %), and Wells/simplified revised Geneva score (53 %). A positive answer for "fear of missing PE" was inversely associated with positive CTPA (OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.14-0.92, p = 0.033), and "Wells/simplified revised Geneva score" was associated with positive CTPA (OR 3.28, 95 % CI 1.24-8.68, p = 0.017). The proportion of positive CTPA was higher if a questionnaire was completed, compared to the 2-year comparison period (26.4 vs. 14.5 %, OR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.36-3.29, p < 0.001). The proportion of positive CTPA was non-significantly higher during the study period than during the comparison period (19.2 vs. 14.5 %, OR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.98-2.0, p = 0.067).
Conclusion: Reasons for CTPA reflecting defensive behavior-such as "fear of missing PE"-were frequent, and were associated with a decreased odds of positive CTPA. Defensive behavior might be modifiable by training in using guidelines.
Similar articles
-
Qualitative Study to Understand Ordering of CT Angiography to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Room Setting.J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Sep;15(9):1276-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Oct 19. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29055608 Free PMC article.
-
Over-Testing for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in American Emergency Departments: The Continuing Epidemic.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jan;13(1):e005753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005753. Epub 2020 Jan 20. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 31957477
-
Automated Pulmonary Embolism Risk Classification and Guideline Adherence for Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Ordering.Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;25(9):1053-1061. doi: 10.1111/acem.13442. Epub 2018 May 25. Acad Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29710413 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency Evaluation for Pulmonary Embolism, Part 2: Diagnostic Approach.J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):104-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.041. Epub 2015 Mar 20. J Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25800524 Review.
-
Pulmonary embolism prevalence among emergency department cohorts: A systematic review and meta-analysis by country of study.J Thromb Haemost. 2021 Jan;19(1):173-185. doi: 10.1111/jth.15124. Epub 2020 Nov 18. J Thromb Haemost. 2021. PMID: 33048461
Cited by
-
Perfusion SPECT in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: how much sensitivity is needed to keep patients alive?Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Sep;40(9):1428-31. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2470-3. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23748237 No abstract available.
-
Age-dependent diagnostic accuracy of clinical scoring systems and D-dimer levels in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA).Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep;29(9):4563-4571. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06039-5. Epub 2019 Feb 19. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30783786
-
Acute cardiac disorder or pneumonia and concomitant presence of pulmonary embolism.PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047418. Epub 2012 Oct 16. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23091623 Free PMC article.
-
How defensive medicine is defined and understood in European medical literature: protocol for a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 28;10(2):e034300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034300. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32114473 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the Utilization of Validated Diagnostic Predictive Tools and D-Dimer in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study from a Public Hospital in New York City.J Clin Med. 2023 May 23;12(11):3629. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113629. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37297824 Free PMC article.