Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;42(8):2031-41.
doi: 10.1002/eji.201242497.

Loss of E protein transcription factors E2A and HEB delays memory-precursor formation during the CD8+ T-cell immune response

Affiliations

Loss of E protein transcription factors E2A and HEB delays memory-precursor formation during the CD8+ T-cell immune response

Louise M D'Cruz et al. Eur J Immunol. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

The transcription factors E2A and HEB (members of the E protein family) have been shown to play essential roles in lymphocyte development, while their negative regulators, the Id proteins, have been implicated in both lymphocyte development and in the CD8(+) T-cell immune response. Here, we show that E proteins also influence CD8(+) T cells responding to infection. E protein expression was upregulated by CD8(+) T cells during the early stages of infection and increased E protein DNA-binding activity could be detected upon TCR stimulation. Deficiency in the E proteins, E2A and HEB, led to increased frequency of terminally differentiated effector KLRG1(hi) CD8(+) T cells in mice during infection, and decreased generation of longer-lived memory-precursor cells during the immune response. These data suggest a model whereby E protein transcription factor activity favors rapid memory-precursor T-cell formation while their negative regulators, Id2 and Id3, are both required for robust effector CD8(+) T-cell response during infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no financial or commercial conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
E2A-GFP expression is upregulated upon CD8+ T-cell activation. Flow cytometric analysis of E2A-GFP expression by CD8+ splenocytes (A) after activation in vitro or (B) after infection. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of CD8+ T cells stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 and analyzed at indicated time points. Gray-line histogram indicates WT control CD8+ T cells and black-line histogram indicates E2A-GFP-expressing CD8+ T cells. (B) WT control mice and E2A-GFP-reporter mice were infected with Lm-OVA and CD8+ Lm-OVA-specific T cells in spleen were analyzed by flow cytometry on indicated days after infection. Kb-OVAp tetramer CD8+ T cells are shown as controls. Gray-line histogram indicates WT control CD8+ T cells and black-line histogram indicates E2A-GFP-expressing CD8+ T cells. Data shown are representative of two independent experiments performed with a total of four mice.
Figure 2
Figure 2
E proteins show increased DNA-binding activity in activated CD8+ T cells in vivo. Electrophoretic mobility-shift assay of nuclear extracts prepared from OT-I+ T cells stimulated during infection. (A) OT-I+ T cells were transferred to recipient mice and the mice subsequently infected with VSV-OVA. One day 4 and day 6 after infection OT-I+ T cells were harvested from the spleens and lymph nodes of infected mice and nuclear extracts were isolated. Nuclear extracts were incubated with a radiolabeled probe containing an E-box site for detection of E protein DNA-binding (µE5) or a control probe containing an octamer-binding site (Oct) for confirmation of the quality of the nuclear extracts. E47 blocking antibody was used to show E47-specific binding to radiolabeled E-box site-specific probe. (B) WT and Id2-deficient OT-I+ T cells were transferred to recipient mice that were then subsequently infected with VSV-OVA. On day 6 after infection OT-I+ T cells were harvested from the spleens and lymph nodes of infected mice and nuclear extracts treated as in (A). Data are representative of two independent experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
E protein-deficient CD8+ cells develop a KLRG1hi CD127lo effector phenotype during Listeria infection. CD45.1+-recipient mice received either 1 × 104 OT-I WT (CD45.2) or OT-I E protein-deficient (CD45.2) cells 1 day before infection with Lm-OVA. (A) Percent population expansion of OT-I WT, OT-I E2A-deficient (E2AKO), OT-I HEB-deficient (HEBKO) or OT-I E2A/HEB double-deficient (DKO) T cells over time in peripheral blood is shown. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of KLRG1 and CD127 expression by OT-I WT and OT-I DKO cells on indicated days after infection in peripheral blood. Numbers in quadrants indicate percentage of cells. (C) Percent population expansion of KLRG1hi OT-I WT or OT-I DKO cells and KLRG1lo OT-I WT or OT-I DKO in peripheral blood was measured over time during Lm-OVA infection. Histograms indicate KLRG1hi and KLRG1lo OT-I cells on day 7 after infection. (D) Flow cytometric analysis of KLRG1 and CD127 expression by OT-I WT and OT-I DKO cells at day 77 (memory) after infection in peripheral blood. Numbers in quadrants indicate percentage of cells. Bar graphs indicate percent population expansion of OT-I WT or DKO cells, KLRG1lo OT-I WT or DKO cells and KLRG1hi OT-I WT or DKO cells in peripheral blood on day 77 (memory) after infection. Data shown are average (+ SEM) with n = 2–7 mice per group. Statistical significance was determined using unpaired two-tailed t-test where **p < 0.005, **p < 0.0005. Data are representative of two independent experiments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Splenic E protein-deficient CD8+ cells develop a KLRG1hi CD127lo effector phenotype during Listeria infection. CD45.1+-recipient mice received either 1 ×104 OT-I WT (CD45.2) or OT-I E protein-deficient (CD45.2) cells 1 day before infection with Lm-OVA. (A) Flow cytometry of KLRG1 and CD127 expression by OT-I WT and OT-I DKO cells in the spleen on indicated days after infection. Numbers in quadrants indicate percentage of cells. (B) Percent population expansion of KLRG1hi OT-I WT or OT-I DKO cells and absolute cell number of KLRG1hi OT-I WT or OT-I DKO in the spleen on indicated days after infection. Data are shown as mean + SEM of 2–3 mice per group and are pooled from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005 (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
Figure 5
Figure 5
E protein-deficient CD8+ cells develop an effector-memory phenotype during early stages of infection. CD45.1.2+-recipient mice received a mixture of 0.25 × 106 OT-I WT (CD45.1+) and OT-I DKO (CD45.2+) cells 1 day before infection with Lm-OVA. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of OT-I T cells in spleen. Numbers beside gated area indicate percent in each. Bar graph indicates percent population expansion of OT-I WT and OT-I DKO cells in spleen from 2 to 3 different mice per group per time point. (B) Infected mice received 1 mg BrdU 4 h before analysis of splenocytes. Bar graph indicates percent BrdU incorporation by OT-I cells from day 3 to day 6 after infection. (C) Viability of OT-I WT and OT-I DKO cells assessed by ex vivo staining with Annexin V from day 3 to day 6 postinfection. (D) Flow cytometry of IFN-γ and TNF-α production by splenocytes restimulated for 6 h in vitro with OVAp or incubated in media alone as unstimulated control on day 6 after infection. Lower flow cytometry plots indicate gated OT-I cells IFN-γ production after in vitro restimulation with OVAp. (E) Bar graphs indicating KLRG1 expression by OT-I WT and OT-I DKO splenocytes from day 3 to day 6 postinfection. Data are shown as mean + SEM of 2–3 mice per group and are representative of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.0005 (unpaired two-tailed t-test).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Gene-expression profile of WT versus E protein-deficient T cells stimulated in vitro. Affymetrix microarray analysis of mRNA from CD8+ T cells from WT and DKO mice, stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 for 16 h. (A) Normalized expression values for WT versus DKO CD8+ T cells. Numbers in corners indicate genes with a difference in expression of 1.7-fold or more in DKO CD8+ T cells versus WT cells (upregulation, red dots; downregulation, blue dots). Data are representative of one experiment with two data sets per group. (B) Gene-expression values of genes of interest with a difference in expression 1.7-fold or more in DKO CD8+ T cells versus WT cells (upregulation, red; downregulation, blue). (C) Selected genes involved in immune effector processes that are activated or repressed in DKO CD8+ T cells. (D) Selected cytokine and chemokine genes that are activated or repressed in DKO CD8+ T cells. (E) E2A DNA-binding sites as identified using ChIP-Seq. Representative examples of Cd28 and Id2 are shown. UCSC Genome Browser was used to visualize binding patterns. Blue pattern denotes E2A DNA binding. Green pattern denotes H3K4 mono-methylation. Red arrow denotes the transcription start site. The Table indicates selected genes up- or downregulated in the microarray that display E2A occupancy as identified by ChIP-Seq.

References

    1. Kaech SM, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R. Effector and memory T-cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2:251–262. - PubMed
    1. Joshi NS, Cui W, Chandele A, Lee HK, Urso DR, Hagman J, Gapin L, Kaech SM. Inflammation directs memory precursor and short-lived effector CD8(+) T-cell fates via the graded expression of T-bet transcription factor. Immunity. 2007;27:281–295. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kalia V, Sarkar S, Subramaniam S, Haining WN, Smith KA, Ahmed R. Prolonged interleukin-2Ralpha expression on virus-specific CD8+ T cells favors terminal-effector differentiation in vivo. Immunity. 2010;32:91–103. - PubMed
    1. Sarkar S, Kalia V, Haining WN, Konieczny BT, Subramaniam S, Ahmed R. Functional and genomic profiling of effector CD8T-cell subsets with distinct memory fates. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:625–640. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kallies A, Xin A, Belz GT, Nutt SL. Blimp-1 transcription factor is required for the differentiation of effector CD8(+) T cells and memory responses. Immunity. 2009;31:283–295. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources