Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 May-Jun;10(3):221-7.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1370.

Typical electronic health record use in primary care practices and the quality of diabetes care

Jesse C Crosson  1 , Pamela A Ohman-Strickland, Deborah J Cohen, Elizabeth C Clark, Benjamin F Crabtree
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Typical electronic health record use in primary care practices and the quality of diabetes care

Jesse C Crosson et al. Ann Fam Med. 2012 May-Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent efforts to encourage meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) assume that widespread adoption will improve the quality of ambulatory care, especially for complex clinical conditions such as diabetes. Cross-sectional studies of typical uses of commercially available ambulatory EHRs provide conflicting evidence for an association between EHR use and improved care, and effects of longer-term EHR use in community-based primary care settings on the quality of care are not well understood.

Methods: We analyzed data from 16 EHR-using and 26 non-EHR-using practices in 2 northeastern states participating in a group-randomized quality improvement trial. Measures of care were assessed for 798 patients with diabetes. We used hierarchical linear models to examine the relationship between EHR use and adherence to evidence-based diabetes care guidelines, and hierarchical logistic models to compare rates of improvement over 3 years.

Results: EHR use was not associated with better adherence to care guidelines or a more rapid improvement in adherence. In fact, patients in practices that did not use an EHR were more likely than those in practices that used an EHR to meet all of 3 intermediate outcomes targets for hemoglobin A(1c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and blood pressure at the 2-year follow-up (odds ratio = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.12-2.51). Although the quality of care improved across all practices, rates of improvement did not differ between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Consistent use of an EHR over 3 years does not ensure successful use for improving the quality of diabetes care. Ongoing efforts to encourage adoption and meaningful use of EHRs in primary care should focus on ensuring that use succeeds in improving care. These efforts will need to include provision of assistance to longer-term EHR users.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Primary care practice selection. EHR = electronic health record; ULTRA = Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC, Stewart E, Jaén C. Transforming physician practices to patient-centered medical homes: lessons from the National Demonstration Project. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):439–445 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(4):614–621 - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–504 - PubMed
    1. Maxson E, Jain S, Kendall M, Mostashari F, Blumenthal D. The Regional Extension Center Program: helping physicians meaningfully use health information technology. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153(10):666–670 - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program, Final Rule. 75 FR 44314. July 28, 2010. http://federalregister.gov/a/2010-17207 Accessed April 16, 2012 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms