Farm to institution: creating access to healthy local and regional foods
- PMID: 22585910
- PMCID: PMC3649468
- DOI: 10.3945/an.111.001677
Farm to institution: creating access to healthy local and regional foods
Abstract
Farm to Institution (FTI) programs are one approach to align food service operations with health and sustainability guidelines, such as those recently developed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and General Services Administration. Programs and policies that support sourcing local and regional foods for schools, hospitals, faith-based organizations, and worksites may benefit institutional customers and their families, farmers, the local community, and the economy. Different models of FTI programs exist. On-site farmer's markets at institutions have been promoted on federal government property, healthcare facilities, and private institutions nationwide. Farm to School programs focus on connecting schools with local agricultural production with the goal of improving school meals and increasing intake of fruits and vegetables in children. Sourcing food from local farms presents a number of challenges including cost and availability of local products, food safety, and liability considerations and lack of skilled labor for food preparation. Institutions utilize multiple strategies to address these barriers, and local, state, and federal polices can help facilitate FTI approaches. FTI enables the purchasing power of institutions to contribute to regional and local food systems, thus potentially affecting social, economic, and ecological systems. Local and state food policy councils can assist in bringing stakeholders together to inform this process. Rigorous research and evaluation is needed to determine and document best practices and substantiate links between FTI and multiple outcomes. Nutritionists, public health practitioners, and researchers can help communities work with institutions to develop, implement, and evaluate programs and policies supporting FTI.
Conflict of interest statement
Author disclosures: D. Harris, M. Lott, V. Lakins, B. Bowden, and J. Kimmons, no conflicts of interest. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.
Similar articles
-
Results from the 2004 Michigan Farm-to-School Survey.J Sch Health. 2006 May;76(5):169-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00090.x. J Sch Health. 2006. PMID: 16635200
-
Developing and implementing health and sustainability guidelines for institutional food service.Adv Nutr. 2012 May 1;3(3):337-42. doi: 10.3945/an.111.001354. Adv Nutr. 2012. PMID: 22585909 Free PMC article.
-
Legal Feasibility and Implementation of Federal Strategies for a National Retail-Based Fruit and Vegetable Subsidy Program in the United States.Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):775-801. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12461. Epub 2020 Jul 21. Milbank Q. 2020. PMID: 32691937 Free PMC article.
-
School-based research and initiatives: fruit and vegetable environment, policy, and pricing workshop.Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39 Suppl 2:S101-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.10.007. Prev Med. 2004. PMID: 15313079 Review.
-
A Historical Review of Changes in Nutrition Standards of USDA Child Meal Programs Relative to Research Findings on the Nutritional Adequacy of Program Meals and the Diet and Nutritional Health of Participants: Implications for Future Research and the Summer Food Service Program.Nutrients. 2015 Dec 4;7(12):10145-67. doi: 10.3390/nu7125523. Nutrients. 2015. PMID: 26690207 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Food in the cold: exploring food security and sovereignty in Whitehorse, Yukon.Int J Circumpolar Health. 2022 Dec;81(1):2025992. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2022.2025992. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2022. PMID: 35081878 Free PMC article.
-
Farmers' perceptions of local food procurement, Mississippi, 2013.Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jun 26;11:E106. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140004. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014. PMID: 24967828 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying effective interventions to promote consumption of protein-rich foods from lower ecological footprint sources: A systematic literature review.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;2(3):e0000209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000209. eCollection 2022. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36962370 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitating Factors and Opportunities for Local Food Purchases in School Meals in Spain.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2009. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042009. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33669594 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of a farm-to-WIC intervention.Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(18):3405-3415. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001976. Epub 2019 Aug 13. Public Health Nutr. 2019. PMID: 31405392 Free PMC article.
References
-
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and General Services Administration Health and sustainability guidelines for federal concessions and vending operations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and General Services Administration; 2011
-
- National Farm to School Network [Internet]. Farm to School: nourishing kids and community; 2011 [cited 2011 Jun 24]. Available from: http://www.farmtoschool.org/
-
- Ross NJ, Anderson MD, Goldberg JP, Rogers BL. Increasing purchases of locally grown produce through worksite sales: an ecological model. J Nutr Educ. 2000;32:304
-
- Ross NJ, Anderson MD, Goldberg JP, Houser R, Rogers BL. Trying and buying locally grown produce at the workplace: results of a marketing intervention. Am J Altern Agric. 1999;14:171–9
-
- Joshi A, Azuma AM, Feenstra G. Do Farm-to-School programs make a difference? Findings and future research needs. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2009;3:229–46
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources