Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May 1;3(3):343-9.
doi: 10.3945/an.111.001677.

Farm to institution: creating access to healthy local and regional foods

Affiliations

Farm to institution: creating access to healthy local and regional foods

Diane Harris et al. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

Farm to Institution (FTI) programs are one approach to align food service operations with health and sustainability guidelines, such as those recently developed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and General Services Administration. Programs and policies that support sourcing local and regional foods for schools, hospitals, faith-based organizations, and worksites may benefit institutional customers and their families, farmers, the local community, and the economy. Different models of FTI programs exist. On-site farmer's markets at institutions have been promoted on federal government property, healthcare facilities, and private institutions nationwide. Farm to School programs focus on connecting schools with local agricultural production with the goal of improving school meals and increasing intake of fruits and vegetables in children. Sourcing food from local farms presents a number of challenges including cost and availability of local products, food safety, and liability considerations and lack of skilled labor for food preparation. Institutions utilize multiple strategies to address these barriers, and local, state, and federal polices can help facilitate FTI approaches. FTI enables the purchasing power of institutions to contribute to regional and local food systems, thus potentially affecting social, economic, and ecological systems. Local and state food policy councils can assist in bringing stakeholders together to inform this process. Rigorous research and evaluation is needed to determine and document best practices and substantiate links between FTI and multiple outcomes. Nutritionists, public health practitioners, and researchers can help communities work with institutions to develop, implement, and evaluate programs and policies supporting FTI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: D. Harris, M. Lott, V. Lakins, B. Bowden, and J. Kimmons, no conflicts of interest. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and General Services Administration Health and sustainability guidelines for federal concessions and vending operations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and General Services Administration; 2011
    1. National Farm to School Network [Internet]. Farm to School: nourishing kids and community; 2011 [cited 2011 Jun 24]. Available from: http://www.farmtoschool.org/
    1. Ross NJ, Anderson MD, Goldberg JP, Rogers BL. Increasing purchases of locally grown produce through worksite sales: an ecological model. J Nutr Educ. 2000;32:304
    1. Ross NJ, Anderson MD, Goldberg JP, Houser R, Rogers BL. Trying and buying locally grown produce at the workplace: results of a marketing intervention. Am J Altern Agric. 1999;14:171–9
    1. Joshi A, Azuma AM, Feenstra G. Do Farm-to-School programs make a difference? Findings and future research needs. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2009;3:229–46

Publication types